These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22413662)
1. Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation. Ball K; Lyons N; Conlon M; Critchley R Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):409-14. PubMed ID: 22413662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland. Wakeling J; Cameron N Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 22413658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs. Williams S; Holmes S; Laugharne K Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27005839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing of revalidation proposals: key findings from the pathfinder pilots. Ball K; Lyons N Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):361-3. PubMed ID: 22413654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Paper trials: a qualitative study exploring the place of portfolios in making revalidation recommendations for Responsible Officers. Furmedge DS; Griffin A; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Gill D BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():66. PubMed ID: 26887892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons for revalidation: a case report of an external review for quality assurance of deanery appraisal systems for general practitioners. MacLeod S; Caesar S Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):415-9. PubMed ID: 22413663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers. Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multisource feedback questionnaires in appraisal and for revalidation: a qualitative study in UK general practice. Hill JJ; Asprey A; Richards SH; Campbell JL Br J Gen Pract; 2012 May; 62(598):e314-21. PubMed ID: 22546590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of appraisal as perceived by general practitioners. Mugweni K; Kibble S; Conlon M Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):393-8. PubMed ID: 22413660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature. Scallan S; Locke R; Eksteen D; Caesar S Educ Prim Care; 2016 Mar; 27(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 26915657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. General practitioners, revalidation and appraisal: a cross sectional survey of attitudes, beliefs and concerns in Lincolnshire. Middlemass J; Siriwardena AN Med Educ; 2003 Sep; 37(9):778-85. PubMed ID: 12950940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London's responsible officers and their appraisers. Griffin A; Furmedge DS; Gill D; O'Keeffe C; Verma A; Smith LJ; Noble L; Field R; Ingham Clark C BMC Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 15():152. PubMed ID: 26392086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audit of annual medical appraisal and revalidation activity across the UK Defence Medical Services 2013-2014. Morris LE; Withnall R J R Army Med Corps; 2017 Feb; 163(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 26759502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Verification of 'learning credits' by GP appraisers. Murie J; Wakeling J Educ Prim Care; 2011 Nov; 22(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 22413657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Appraisal system for community child health doctors. Horn N; Pullan C Public Health; 1996 Mar; 110(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 8901252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The general practitioner workforce crisis in England: a qualitative study of how appraisal and revalidation are contributing to intentions to leave practice. Dale J; Potter R; Owen K; Leach J BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():84. PubMed ID: 27439982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards an understanding of how appraisal of doctors produces its effects: a realist review. Brennan N; Bryce M; Pearson M; Wong G; Cooper C; Archer J Med Educ; 2017 Oct; 51(10):1002-1013. PubMed ID: 28758237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can GPs working in secure environments in England re-license using the Royal College of General Practitioners revalidation proposals? Coomber J; Charlton R; Thistlethwaite JE; England L BMC Fam Pract; 2012 Dec; 13():123. PubMed ID: 23253694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sessional GPs: support needed to provide the evidence required for appraisal and revalidation. Wharton R; Pollard K Educ Prim Care; 2010 Sep; 21(5):308-15. PubMed ID: 20868546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using emotional intelligence to facilitate strengthened appraiser development. Tavabie A; Koczwara A; Patterson F Educ Prim Care; 2010 Jan; 21(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 20202316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]