These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22414212)

  • 1. Monitoring airborne biotic contaminants in the indoor environment of pig and poultry confinement buildings.
    Hong PY; Li X; Yang X; Shinkai T; Zhang Y; Wang X; Mackie RI
    Environ Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 14(6):1420-31. PubMed ID: 22414212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Size-related bacterial diversity and tetracycline resistance gene abundance in the air of concentrated poultry feeding operations.
    Gao M; Jia R; Qiu T; Han M; Wang X
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Jan; 220(Pt B):1342-1348. PubMed ID: 27836477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seasonal variability in airborne biotic contaminants in swine confinement buildings.
    Kumari P; Choi HL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112897. PubMed ID: 25393011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Manure removal system influences the abundance and composition of airborne biotic contaminants in swine confinement buildings.
    Kumari P; Choi HL
    Environ Monit Assess; 2015 Aug; 187(8):537. PubMed ID: 26220780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human pathogens and tetracycline-resistant bacteria in bioaerosols of swine confinement buildings and in nasal flora of hog producers.
    Létourneau V; Nehmé B; Mériaux A; Massé D; Cormier Y; Duchaine C
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2010 Nov; 213(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 20971680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings.
    Duchaine C; Grimard Y; Cormier Y
    AIHAJ; 2000; 61(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10772615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characteristics and health impacts of bioaerosols in animal barns: A comprehensive study.
    Zhang X; Ma Z; Hao P; Ji S; Gao Y
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2024 Jun; 278():116381. PubMed ID: 38676963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of production systems on swine confinement buildings bioaerosols.
    Létourneau V; Nehmé B; Mériaux A; Massé D; Duchaine C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19953413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potentially pathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial resistance in bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations.
    Just NA; Létourneau V; Kirychuk SP; Singh B; Duchaine C
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 May; 56(4):440-9. PubMed ID: 22156572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bacterial diversity characterization of bioaerosols from cage-housed and floor-housed poultry operations.
    Just N; Kirychuk S; Gilbert Y; Létourneau V; Veillette M; Singh B; Duchaine C
    Environ Res; 2011 May; 111(4):492-8. PubMed ID: 21288509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microbial dynamics and climatic interactions in pig sheds: Insights into airborne microbes and particulate matter concentrations.
    Katwal S; Singh Y; Bedi JS; Chandra M; Honparkhe M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2024 May; 196(6):511. PubMed ID: 38703303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of airborne bacteria in a German turkey house by cultivation-based and molecular methods.
    Fallschissel K; Klug K; Kämpfer P; Jäckel U
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Nov; 54(8):934-43. PubMed ID: 20720091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Airborne bacterial contaminations in typical Chinese wet market with live poultry trade.
    Gao XL; Shao MF; Luo Y; Dong YF; Ouyang F; Dong WY; Li J
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():681-687. PubMed ID: 27503629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epizootiological characteristics of viable bacteria and fungi in indoor air from porcine, chicken, or bovine husbandry confinement buildings.
    Roque K; Lim GD; Jo JH; Shin KM; Song ES; Gautam R; Kim CY; Lee K; Shin S; Yoo HS; Heo Y; Kim HA
    J Vet Sci; 2016 Dec; 17(4):531-538. PubMed ID: 27456779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Airborne bacteria, endotoxin and fungi in dust in poultry and swine confinement buildings.
    Clark S; Rylander R; Larsson L
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Jul; 44(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 6613856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Airborne bacterial communities in the poultry farm and their relevance with environmental factors and antibiotic resistance genes.
    Xu X; Zhou W; Xie C; Zhu Y; Tang W; Zhou X; Xiao H
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 846():157420. PubMed ID: 35850323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Culture-independent characterization of bacteria and fungi in a poultry bioaerosol using pyrosequencing: a new approach.
    Nonnenmann MW; Bextine B; Dowd SE; Gilmore K; Levin JL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Dec; 7(12):693-9. PubMed ID: 21058154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concentration of airborne Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA and MSSA), total bacteria, and endotoxins in pig farms.
    Masclaux FG; Sakwinska O; Charrière N; Semaani E; Oppliger A
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 23293050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Culture-independent approach of the bacterial bioaerosol diversity in the standard swine confinement buildings, and assessment of the seasonal effect.
    Nehme B; Létourneau V; Forster RJ; Veillette M; Duchaine C
    Environ Microbiol; 2008 Mar; 10(3):665-75. PubMed ID: 18237302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Nature and amount of aerial pollutants from livestock buildings].
    Hartung J
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Jun; 105(6):213-6. PubMed ID: 9693454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.