These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22415224)

  • 21. How environmental regularities affect people's information search in probability judgments from experience.
    Hoffart JC; Rieskamp J; Dutilh G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):219-231. PubMed ID: 30024248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are accurate witnesses more likely to make absolute judgments?
    Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Lemieux JM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 31(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 18954905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies.
    Cohen AL; Staub A
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Sep; 81():26-47. PubMed ID: 26354671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prior divergence: do researchers and participants share the same prior probability distributions?
    Fang C; Carp S; Shapira Z
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):744-62. PubMed ID: 21564269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Social modulation of spatial judgment: The case of line bisection task.
    D'Ascenzo S; Rubichi S; Di Gregorio G; Tommasi L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jun; 167():24-9. PubMed ID: 27089035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
    Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of wording and stimulus format on the use of contingency information in causal judgment.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Mar; 31(2):231-42. PubMed ID: 12749465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evidence evaluation: measure Z corresponds to human utility judgments better than measure L and optimal-experimental-design models.
    Rusconi P; Marelli M; D'Addario M; Russo S; Cherubini P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):703-23. PubMed ID: 24446753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Causal judgement from contingency information: judging interactions between two causal candidates.
    White PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jul; 55(3):819-38. PubMed ID: 12188515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The construction of categorization judgments: using subjective confidence and response latency to test a distributed model.
    Koriat A; Sorka H
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():21-38. PubMed ID: 25460376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Schema bias in source monitoring varies with encoding conditions: support for a probability-matching account.
    Kuhlmann BG; Vaterrodt B; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1365-76. PubMed ID: 22545608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. "1-in-X" bias: "1-in-X" format causes overestimation of health-related risks.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Bonnefon JF
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Dec; 24(4):431-439. PubMed ID: 30247046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accounting for occurrences: an explanation for some novel tendencies in causal judgment from contingency information.
    White PA
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jun; 37(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 19460956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Too Worried to Judge: On the Role of Perceived Severity in Medical Decision-Making.
    Colomé À; Rodríguez-Ferreiro J; Tubau E
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1906. PubMed ID: 30356743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Obsessive-compulsive tendencies are related to indecisiveness and reliance on feedback in a neutral color judgment task.
    Sarig S; Dar R; Liberman N
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2012 Mar; 43(1):692-7. PubMed ID: 21983353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evidence affects hypothesis judgments more if accumulated gradually than if presented instantaneously.
    Whitman JC; Woodward TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Dec; 18(6):1156-65. PubMed ID: 21822566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account.
    Mandel DR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Second-order probability affects hypothesis confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Osherson D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 20081173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The preference of probability over negative values in action selection.
    Neyedli HF; Welsh TN
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):261-83. PubMed ID: 25004846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: probability and the mental representation of events.
    Wakslak CJ; Trope Y; Liberman N; Alony R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):641-53. PubMed ID: 17087578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.