BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2241526)

  • 21. Internal quality control, proficiency testing, and the clinical relevance of laboratory testing.
    Kafka MT
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 3355347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Informatics tools for quality in anatomic pathology.
    Prichard JW; Strevig G; Brown AM; Wilkerson ML
    Clin Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(2):207-22, vi. PubMed ID: 18436067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Standards, options and recommendations for the composition of anatomic and surgical pathology reports or cytopathology reports in oncology].
    Arnould L; Fiche M; Blanc-Vincent MP; Le Doussal V; Signal-Zafrani B; Gory-Delaboere G; Briffod M; Vielh P; Voigt JJ;
    Ann Pathol; 2003 Feb; 23(1):79-95. PubMed ID: 12743509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Development of the Joint Commission's indicators for monitoring the medication use system.
    Schaff RL; Schumock GT; Nadzam DM
    Hosp Pharm; 1991 Apr; 26(4):326-9, 350. PubMed ID: 10110245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An implementation plan for autopsy quality control and quality assurance.
    Young NA; Naryshkin S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 May; 117(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 8489345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The process of quality assurance. Quality indicators in clinical pathology.
    Koepke JA; Klee GG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Nov; 114(11):1136-9. PubMed ID: 2241523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An optometric quality assurance program.
    Rich CG; Yaniglos SS; Daniel TE; Halabis JA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Nov; 64(11):782-6. PubMed ID: 8120332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standards of patient care: the Joint Commission focus on nursing quality assurance.
    Patterson CH
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):625-38. PubMed ID: 3166521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The new quality assurance standard of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals.
    Affeldt JE
    West J Med; 1980 Feb; 132(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 6930132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quality assurance in forensic pathology.
    Ong BB; Milne N
    Malays J Pathol; 2009 Jun; 31(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 19694309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Measuring quality in anatomic pathology.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM
    Clin Lab Med; 2008 Jun; 28(2):245-59, vi. PubMed ID: 18436069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An overview of the College of American Pathologists' programs in surgical pathology and cytopathology. Data summary of diagnostic performance in cervical cytopathology.
    Penner DW
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(4):439-42. PubMed ID: 2750431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quality assurance in obstetrics: a model.
    Silberman L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep; 76(3 Pt 1):466-70. PubMed ID: 2381625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correspondence re: Frable WJ, Kempson RL, Rosai J: Quality assurance and quality control in anatomic pathology: standardization of the Surgical Pathology Report. Mod Pathol 5:102a, 1992; and Rosai J, et al: Standardization of the Surgical Pathology Report. Mod Pathol 5:197, 1992.
    Johnson FG
    Mod Pathol; 1992 Nov; 5(6):687. PubMed ID: 1369807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accrediting organizations and quality improvement.
    Viswanathan HN; Salmon JW
    Am J Manag Care; 2000 Oct; 6(10):1117-30. PubMed ID: 11184667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The BSCC code of practice--exfoliative cytopathology (excluding gynaecological cytopathology).
    Chandra A; Cross P; Denton K; Giles T; Hemming D; Payne C; Wilson A; Wilson P
    Cytopathology; 2009 Aug; 20(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 19659955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
    Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Point of care testing: regulation and accreditation.
    Carlson DA
    Clin Lab Sci; 1996; 9(5):298-302; quiz 303-4. PubMed ID: 10163657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recommendations for quality assurance and improvement in surgical and autopsy pathology.
    Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Nov; 30(11):1469-71. PubMed ID: 17063090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.