These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2241547)

  • 1. Foot placement angle and arch type: effect on rearfoot motion.
    Kernozek TW; Ricard MD
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Nov; 71(12):988-91. PubMed ID: 2241547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quadriceps angle and rearfoot motion: relationships in walking.
    Kernozek TW; Greer NL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Apr; 74(4):407-10. PubMed ID: 8466423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running.
    Clarke TE; Frederick EC; Hamill CL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1983; 15(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 6645865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of shoes on the torsion and rearfoot motion in running.
    Stacoff A; Kälin X; Stüssi E
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1991 Apr; 23(4):482-90. PubMed ID: 1676133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model.
    Levinger P; Murley GS; Barton CJ; Cotchett MP; McSweeney SR; Menz HB
    Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 20696579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of foot type on in-shoe plantar pressure during walking and running.
    Chuckpaiwong B; Nunley JA; Mall NA; Queen RM
    Gait Posture; 2008 Oct; 28(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 18337103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Feb; 21(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 16269207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between static lower extremity measurements and rearfoot motion during walking.
    McPoil TG; Cornwall MW
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1996 Nov; 24(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 8902683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic differences between normal and low arched feet in children using the Heidelberg foot measurement method.
    Twomey D; McIntosh AS; Simon J; Lowe K; Wolf SI
    Gait Posture; 2010 May; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20172730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying rearfoot-forefoot coordination in human walking.
    Chang R; Van Emmerik R; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):3101-5. PubMed ID: 18778823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
    Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in foot and shank coupling due to alterations in foot strike pattern during running.
    Pohl MB; Buckley JG
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 18006125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Forefoot, rearfoot and shank coupling: effect of variations in speed and mode of gait.
    Pohl MB; Messenger N; Buckley JG
    Gait Posture; 2007 Feb; 25(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 16759862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High heeled shoes: their effect on center of mass position, posture, three-dimensional kinematics, rearfoot motion, and ground reaction forces.
    Snow RE; Williams KR
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1994 May; 75(5):568-76. PubMed ID: 8185452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of two types of foot orthoses on rearfoot mechanics.
    Brown GP; Donatelli R; Catlin PA; Wooden MJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1995 May; 21(5):258-67. PubMed ID: 7787849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of a custom foot orthotic intervention on lower extremity dynamics in healthy runners.
    MacLean C; Davis IM; Hamill J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):623-30. PubMed ID: 16603287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strength training effects on rearfoot motion in running.
    Feltner ME; MacRae HS; MacRae PG; Turner NS; Hartman CA; Summers ML; Welch MD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Aug; 26(8):1021-7. PubMed ID: 7968419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of foot motion during running using a joint co-ordinate system.
    Soutas-Little RW; Beavis GC; Verstraete MC; Markus TL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1987 Jun; 19(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 3600243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.