These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22415524)

  • 1. Are multiple visual short-term memory storages necessary to explain the retro-cue effect?
    Makovski T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):470-6. PubMed ID: 22415524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores?
    Sligte IG; Scholte HS; Lamme VA
    PLoS One; 2008 Feb; 3(2):e1699. PubMed ID: 18301775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.
    Rerko L; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):712-28. PubMed ID: 24442551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory.
    van Moorselaar D; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J; Lamme VA; Sligte IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1755-63. PubMed ID: 25867613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Orienting Attention to Auditory and Visual Short-term Memory: The Roles of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognitive Status.
    Garami L; Chow R; Fakuade A; Swaminathan S; Alain C
    Exp Aging Res; 2020; 46(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 31750789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Functional interplay of top-down attention with affective codes during visual short-term memory maintenance.
    Kuo BC; Lin SH; Yeh YY
    Cortex; 2018 Jun; 103():55-70. PubMed ID: 29554542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down modulation of alpha power and pattern similarity for threatening representations in visual short-term memory.
    Kuo BC; Li CH; Lin SH; Hu SH; Yeh YY
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():21-30. PubMed ID: 28887064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention.
    Delvenne JF; Cleeremans A; Laloyaux C
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 20178921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms by which attention modulates the comparison of remembered and perceptual representations.
    Kuo BC; Astle DE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86666. PubMed ID: 24466193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unloading and reloading working memory: attending to one item frees capacity.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1237-56. PubMed ID: 24730737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms.
    Fu X; Ye C; Hu Z; Li Z; Liang T; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108320. PubMed ID: 35337895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invalid retro-cues can eliminate the retro-cue benefit: Evidence for a hybridized account.
    Gözenman F; Tanoue RT; Metoyer T; Berryhill ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1748-54. PubMed ID: 25045904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory.
    Li Q; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):450-63. PubMed ID: 25338537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective maintenance in visual working memory does not require sustained visual attention.
    Hollingworth A; Maxcey-Richard AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1047-58. PubMed ID: 23067118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.