These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22415910)

  • 1. A new permutation-based method for assessing agreement between two observers making replicated quantitative readings.
    Pan Y; Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(20):2249-61. PubMed ID: 22415910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new permutation-based method for assessing agreement between two observers making replicated binary readings.
    Pan Y; Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):839-53. PubMed ID: 21432878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing observer agreement in studies involving replicated binary observations.
    Haber M; Gao J; Barnhart HX
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):757-66. PubMed ID: 17613652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A general approach to evaluating agreement between two observers or methods of measurement from quantitative data with replicated measurements.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Apr; 17(2):151-69. PubMed ID: 17698934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coefficients of agreement for fixed observers.
    Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2006 Jun; 15(3):255-71. PubMed ID: 16768299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resampling dependent concordance correlation coefficients.
    Williamson JM; Crawford SB; Lin HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):685-96. PubMed ID: 17613648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings.
    Barnhart HX; Song J; Haber MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1371-84. PubMed ID: 15570569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing individual agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS; Haber MJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):697-719. PubMed ID: 17613649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Lokhnygina Y; Kosinski AS; Haber M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):721-38. PubMed ID: 17613650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer programs for the concordance correlation coefficient.
    Crawford SB; Kosinski AS; Lin HM; Williamson JM; Barnhart HX
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 17709153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers.
    Barnhart HX; Haber M; Song J
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12495158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An AUC-like index for agreement assessment.
    Zhang Z; Wang Y; Duan F
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(4):893-907. PubMed ID: 24697741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A graphical method for assessing agreement with the mean between multiple observers using continuous measures.
    Jones M; Dobson A; O'Brian S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1308-13. PubMed ID: 21737402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of coefficients of individual agreement (CIAs) for quantitative and binary data using SAS and R.
    Pan Y; Gao J; Haber M; Barnhart HX
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 May; 98(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 20079947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust estimators of the concordance correlation coefficient.
    King TS; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(3):83-105. PubMed ID: 11725932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Simple Approach for Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Two Concordance Correlation Coefficients Estimated on the Same Subjects.
    Lin HM; Williamson JM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(6):1145-60. PubMed ID: 25321842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurements from 3D reconstructed multi-directional views using phantom data set on MRA image sequence.
    Kim DY; Park JW
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18619751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data.
    King TS; Chinchilli VM
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(14):2131-47. PubMed ID: 11439426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing agreement with repeated measures for random observers.
    Chen CC; Barnhart HX
    Stat Med; 2011 Dec; 30(30):3546-59. PubMed ID: 22095759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.