BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22415937)

  • 1. Misuse of DeLong test to compare AUCs for nested models.
    Demler OV; Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2012 Oct; 31(23):2577-87. PubMed ID: 22415937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalence of improvement in area under ROC curve and linear discriminant analysis coefficient under assumption of normality.
    Demler OV; Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(12):1410-8. PubMed ID: 21337594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inference for the difference in the area under the ROC curve derived from nested binary regression models.
    Heller G; Seshan VE; Moskowitz CS; Gönen M
    Biostatistics; 2017 Apr; 18(2):260-274. PubMed ID: 27655817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymptotic distribution of ∆AUC, NRIs, and IDI based on theory of U-statistics.
    Demler OV; Pencina MJ; Cook NR; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3334-3360. PubMed ID: 28627112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the assessment of the added value of new predictive biomarkers.
    Chen W; Samuelson FW; Gallas BD; Kang L; Sahiner B; Petrick N
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():98. PubMed ID: 23895587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
    Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nested logistic regression models and ΔAUC applications: Change-point analysis.
    Lee CY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Jul; 30(7):1654-1666. PubMed ID: 34125622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single reader between-cases AUC estimator with nested data.
    Du H; Wen S; Guo Y; Jin F; Gallas BD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Nov; 31(11):2069-2086. PubMed ID: 35790462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models.
    Pencina MJ; D'Agostino RB; Pencina KM; Janssens AC; Greenland P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Sep; 176(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 22875755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.
    Feng D; Cortese G; Baumgartner R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A modified Wald interval for the area under the ROC curve (AUC) in diagnostic case-control studies.
    Kottas M; Kuss O; Zapf A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Feb; 14():26. PubMed ID: 24552686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One statistical test is sufficient for assessing new predictive markers.
    Vickers AJ; Cronin AM; Begg CB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jan; 11():13. PubMed ID: 21276237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing for improvement in prediction model performance.
    Pepe MS; Kerr KF; Longton G; Wang Z
    Stat Med; 2013 Apr; 32(9):1467-82. PubMed ID: 23296397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Discriminatory Ability of Renalase and Biomarkers of Cardiac Remodeling for the Prediction of Ischemia in Chronic Heart Failure Patients With the Regard to the Ejection Fraction.
    Stojanovic D; Mitic V; Stojanovic M; Petrovic D; Ignjatovic A; Milojkovic M; Dunjic O; Milenkovic J; Bojanic V; Deljanin Ilic M
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():691513. PubMed ID: 34395559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
    Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated small changes in predicted risks.
    Martens FK; Tonk EC; Kers JG; Janssens AC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():159-164. PubMed ID: 27430730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simple Decision-Analytic Functions of the AUC for Ruling Out a Risk Prediction Model and an Added Predictor.
    Baker SG
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Feb; 38(2):225-234. PubMed ID: 29025299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of correlation of predictors on discrimination of risk models in development and external populations.
    Kundu S; Mazumdar M; Ferket B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):63. PubMed ID: 28420342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of three methods for estimating the standard error of the area under the curve in ROC analysis of quantitative data.
    Hajian-Tilaki KO; Hanley JA
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Nov; 9(11):1278-85. PubMed ID: 12449360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Easy and accurate variance estimation of the nonparametric estimator of the partial area under the ROC curve and its application.
    Yu J; Yang L; Vexler A; Hutson AD
    Stat Med; 2016 Jun; 35(13):2251-82. PubMed ID: 26790540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.