881 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22415966)
1. A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
Dong G; Shih WJ; Moore D; Quan H; Marcella S
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2055-67. PubMed ID: 22415966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian decision sequential analysis with survival endpoint in phase II clinical trials.
Zhao L; Woodworth G
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(9):1339-52. PubMed ID: 19226557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical guidelines for adaptive seamless phase II/III clinical trials that use Bayesian methods.
Kimani PK; Glimm E; Maurer W; Hutton JL; Stallard N
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2068-85. PubMed ID: 22437262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian predictive strategy for an adaptive two-stage design in phase II clinical trials.
Sambucini V
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(13):1430-42. PubMed ID: 20099246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian design of single-arm phase II clinical trials with continuous monitoring.
Johnson VE; Cook JD
Clin Trials; 2009 Jun; 6(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19528131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian designs with frequentist and Bayesian error rate considerations.
Wang YG; Leung DH; Li M; Tan SB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2005 Oct; 14(5):445-56. PubMed ID: 16248347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Bayesian predictive two-stage design for phase II clinical trials.
Sambucini V
Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1199-224. PubMed ID: 17763528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal two-stage designs allowing flexibility in number of subjects for phase II clinical trials.
Masaki N; Koyama T; Yoshimura I; Hamada C
J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Jul; 19(4):721-31. PubMed ID: 20183436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A type of sample size design in cancer clinical trials for response rate estimation.
Liu J
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jan; 32(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 20965278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical designs for early phases of cancer clinical trials.
Guan S
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1109-26. PubMed ID: 23075011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On Simon's two-stage design for single-arm phase IIA cancer clinical trials under beta-binomial distribution.
Liu J; Lin Y; Shih WJ
Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(10):1084-95. PubMed ID: 20077506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
Polley MY; Cheung YK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size reestimation by Bayesian prediction.
Wang MD
Biom J; 2007 Jun; 49(3):365-77. PubMed ID: 17623342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An alternative phase II/III design for continuous endpoints.
Huang WS; Liu JP; Hsiao CF
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 20186724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phase I (or phase II) dose-ranging clinical trials: proposal of a two-stage Bayesian design.
Zohar S; Chevret S
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 12635905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An adjustment for patient heterogeneity in the design of two-stage phase II trials.
Sposto R; Gaynon PS
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2566-79. PubMed ID: 19521973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
