247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22416260)
41. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating intraosseous cleft formation in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures before vertebroplasty.
Lin WC; Chen HL; Lu CH; Wang HC; Wu RW; Cheng YF; Lui CC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1244-50. PubMed ID: 21217458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating vertebral compression fractures caused by malignancy, osteoporosis, and infections.
Abdel-Wanis ME; Solyman MT; Hasan NM
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2011 Aug; 19(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 21857034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging.
Yuh WT; Zachar CK; Barloon TJ; Sato Y; Sickels WJ; Hawes DR
Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):215-8. PubMed ID: 2740506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Diffusion-weighted imaging of bone marrow.
Dietrich O; Biffar A; Reiser MF; Baur-Melnyk A
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2009 Jun; 13(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 19455476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Retrospective review of biopsy results following percutaneous fixation of vertebral compression fractures.
Schoenfeld AJ; Dinicola NJ; Ehrler DM; Koerber A; Paxos M; Shorten SD; Bowers J; Jackson E; Smith MJ
Injury; 2008 Mar; 39(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 17880977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging.
Jung HS; Jee WH; McCauley TR; Ha KY; Choi KH
Radiographics; 2003; 23(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 12533652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Quantitative evaluation of T2* relaxation times for the differentiation of acute benign and malignant vertebral body fractures.
Schmeel FC; Luetkens JA; Feißt A; Enkirch SJ; Endler CH; Wagenhäuser PJ; Schmeel LC; Träber F; Schild HH; Kukuk GM
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():59-65. PubMed ID: 30396672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Malignant versus benign vertebral compression fractures: can we use bone SPECT as a substitute for MR imaging?
Tokuda O; Harada Y; Ueda T; Ohishi Y; Matsunaga N
Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Mar; 32(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 21150808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Standard-b-value vs low-b-value DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures: a meta-analysis.
Luo Z; Litao L; Gu S; Luo X; Li D; Yu L; Ma Y
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150384. PubMed ID: 26612466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Marrow edema variability in acute spine fractures.
Brinckman MA; Chau C; Ross JS
Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 25304448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
Biffar A; Sourbron S; Dietrich O; Schmidt G; Ingrisch M; Reiser MF; Baur-Melnyk A
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Dec; 76(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 20580503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MR imaging for differentiation of acute benign and neoplastic compression fractures of the spine.
Schmeel FC; Luetkens JA; Enkirch SJ; Feißt A; Endler CH; Schmeel LC; Wagenhäuser PJ; Träber F; Schild HH; Kukuk GM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5001-5009. PubMed ID: 29858641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Evaluation of bone marrow by opposed phase T1-weighted images and enhanced MR imaging].
Amano Y; Tanabe Y; Miyashita T; Hayashi H; Horiuchi J; Nomura T; Kumazaki T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Sep; 54(10):958-64. PubMed ID: 7971187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Measurement of fat content in vertebral marrow using a modified dixon sequence to differentiate benign from malignant processes.
Yoo HJ; Hong SH; Kim DH; Choi JY; Chae HD; Jeong BM; Ahn JM; Kang HS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1534-1544. PubMed ID: 27690264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma. Part I. Distribution and appearance at MR imaging.
Lecouvet FE; Vande Berg BC; Maldague BE; Michaux L; Laterre E; Michaux JL; Ferrant A; Malghem J
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 9205246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Differentiation of Acute Osteoporotic and Malignant Vertebral Fractures by Quantification of Fat Fraction With a Dixon MRI Sequence.
Kim DH; Yoo HJ; Hong SH; Choi JY; Chae HD; Chung BM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1331-1339. PubMed ID: 28858543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging?
An HS; Andreshak TG; Nguyen C; Williams A; Daniels D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Aug; 20(16):1776-82. PubMed ID: 7502133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of sacral insufficiency fractures: comparison with metastases of the sacrum.
Byun WM; Jang HW; Kim SW; Jang SH; Ahn SH; Ahn MW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(26):E820-4. PubMed ID: 18091477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher M; Amann G; Dominkus M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18448302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Value of opposed-phase gradient-echo technique in distinguishing between benign and malignant vertebral lesions.
Zampa V; Cosottini M; Michelassi C; Ortori S; Bruschini L; Bartolozzi C
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jul; 12(7):1811-8. PubMed ID: 12111073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
