414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22416788)
1. Lymph node count threshold for optimal pelvic lymph node staging in prostate cancer.
Abdollah F; Sun M; Thuret R; Jeldres C; Tian Z; Briganti A; Shariat SF; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Int J Urol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):645-51. PubMed ID: 22416788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Gacci M; Schiavina R; Lanciotti M; Masieri L; Serni S; Vagnoni V; Abdollah F; Carini M; Martorana G; Montorsi F
Urol Int; 2013; 90(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 23296120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Capitanio U; Chun FK; Gallina A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Di Girolamo V; Bertini R; Guazzoni G; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2008 Oct; 54(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 18514383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.
Suardi N; Larcher A; Haese A; Ficarra V; Govorov A; Buffi NM; Walz J; Rocco B; Borghesi M; Steuber T; Pini G; Briganti A; Mottrie AM; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Pushkar D; Van Der Poel H;
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24411992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardized comparison of robot-assisted limited and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer.
Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Novara G; Wilson TG
BJU Int; 2013 Jul; 112(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 23351148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: frequency and distribution of nodal metastases in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series.
Godoy G; von Bodman C; Chade DC; Dillioglugil O; Eastham JA; Fine SW; Scardino PT; Laudone VP
J Urol; 2012 Jun; 187(6):2082-6. PubMed ID: 22498221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Seminal vesicle biopsy and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection: implications for patient selection in the radiotherapeutic management of prostate cancer.
Stock RG; Stone NN; Ianuzzi C; Unger P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Nov; 33(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 7591888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathologic nodal staging scores in patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a postoperative decision tool.
Kluth LA; Abdollah F; Xylinas E; Rieken M; Fajkovic H; Sun M; Karakiewicz PI; Seitz C; Schramek P; Herman MP; Becker A; Loidl W; Pummer K; Nonis A; Lee RK; Lotan Y; Scherr DS; Seiler D; Chun FK; Graefen M; Tewari A; Gönen M; Montorsi F; Shariat SF; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 23850255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical cystectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: survival of patients with lymph node metastasis above the bifurcation of the common iliac vessels treated with surgery only.
Steven K; Poulsen AL
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1218-23; discussion 1223-4. PubMed ID: 17698113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
Yuh BE; Ruel NH; Mejia R; Wilson CM; Wilson TG
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):1004-10. PubMed ID: 22366188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical assessment of ideal nodal yield at pelvic lymphadenectomy to accurately diagnose prostate cancer nodal metastasis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Briganti A; Chun FK; Salonia A; Gallina A; Zanni G; Scattoni V; Valiquette L; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2007 Jan; 69(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 17270638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of lymph node counts on the detection of pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Barth PJ; Gerharz EW; Ramaswamy A; Riedmiller H
Pathol Res Pract; 1999; 195(9):633-6. PubMed ID: 10507083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fluorescence Guided Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer.
Hruby S; Englberger C; Lusuardi L; Schätz T; Kunit T; Abdel-Aal AM; Hager M; Janetschek G
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):357-63. PubMed ID: 25896557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance characteristics of computed tomography in detecting lymph node metastases in contemporary patients with prostate cancer treated with extended pelvic lymph node dissection.
Briganti A; Abdollah F; Nini A; Suardi N; Gallina A; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni NM; Salonia A; Colombo R; Freschi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2012 Jun; 61(6):1132-8. PubMed ID: 22099610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: the positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy.
Da Pozzo LF; Cozzarini C; Briganti A; Suardi N; Salonia A; Bertini R; Gallina A; Bianchi M; Fantini GV; Bolognesi A; Fazio F; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1003-11. PubMed ID: 19211184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer.
Cagiannos I; Karakiewicz P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Rabbani F; Gerigk C; Reuter V; Graefen M; Hammerer PG; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Kupelian P; Klein E; Quinn DI; Henshall SM; Grygiel JJ; Sutherland RL; Stricker PD; Morash CG; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1798-803. PubMed ID: 14532779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limited pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy does not affect 5-year failure rates for low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE.
Berglund RK; Sadetsky N; DuChane J; Carroll PR; Klein EA
J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):526-29; discussion 529-30. PubMed ID: 17222625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decreasing rate and extent of lymph node staging in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy may undermine the rate of diagnosis of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.
Abdollah F; Sun M; Thuret R; Budäus L; Jeldres C; Graefen M; Briganti A; Perrotte P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2010 Dec; 58(6):882-92. PubMed ID: 20932637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differing risk of cancer death among patients with lymph node metastasis after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: identification of risk categories according to number of positive nodes and Gleason score.
Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Brunocilla E; Manferrari F; Fiorentino M; Vagnoni V; Baccos A; Pultrone CV; Rocca GC; Rizzi S; Martorana G
BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):1237-44. PubMed ID: 23331345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head comparison of lymph node density and number of positive lymph nodes in stratifying the outcome of patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer submitted to radical prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection.
Passoni NM; Abdollah F; Suardi N; Gallina A; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Salonia A; Freschi M; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):29.e21-8. PubMed ID: 23490908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
