These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22416840)

  • 1. Robust small-sample inference for fixed effects in general Gaussian linear models.
    Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(3):544-64. PubMed ID: 22416840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1172-87. PubMed ID: 23957522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
    Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator.
    Skene SS; Kenward MG
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2825-37. PubMed ID: 20839367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of small-sample standard-error corrections for generalised estimating equations in stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome: A simulation study.
    Thompson JA; Hemming K; Forbes A; Fielding K; Hayes R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):425-439. PubMed ID: 32970526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of bias-corrected empirical covariance estimators with generalized estimating equations in small-sample longitudinal study settings.
    Ford WP; Westgate PM
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4318-4329. PubMed ID: 30073684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood.
    Kenward MG; Roger JH
    Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):983-97. PubMed ID: 9333350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of recent methods for the analysis of small-sample cross-over studies.
    Chen X; Wei L
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(18):2821-33. PubMed ID: 12953282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified robust variance estimator for generalized estimating equations with improved small-sample performance.
    Wang M; Long Q
    Stat Med; 2011 May; 30(11):1278-91. PubMed ID: 21538453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of number of clusters and magnitude of within-cluster homogeneity in outcomes on the performance of four variance estimators for a marginal multivariable Cox regression model fit to clustered data in the context of observational research.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(17):3264-3279. PubMed ID: 38822699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of heteroscedasticity between treatment groups on mixed-effects models for repeated measures.
    Gosho M; Maruo K
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):578-592. PubMed ID: 29978944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of statistical methods for clustered data analysis with Gaussian error.
    Feng Z; McLerran D; Grizzle J
    Stat Med; 1996 Aug; 15(16):1793-806. PubMed ID: 8870161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements II: a modified Box correction.
    Skene SS; Kenward MG
    Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2838-56. PubMed ID: 20860066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the analysis of very small samples of Gaussian repeated measurements: an alternative approach.
    Westgate PM; Burchett WW
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(6):958-970. PubMed ID: 28064473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations.
    Pan W; Wall MM
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1429-41. PubMed ID: 12185894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of the violation of normality and sphericity in the linear mixed model in split-plot designs].
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2012; 24(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 22748739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-over trials with censored data.
    Feingold M; Gillespie BW
    Stat Med; 1996 May; 15(10):953-67. PubMed ID: 8783435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of internal pilots with the univariate approach to repeated measures.
    Coffey CS; Muller KE
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2469-85. PubMed ID: 12872303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.