132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22417597)
1. Quantification of Salmonella in food samples from India using the MINI-MSRV MPN and modified MINI-MSRV MPN methods.
Shashidhar R; Srivastava I; Bandekar JR
J Food Sci; 2011 Oct; 76(8):M564-7. PubMed ID: 22417597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quantitative analysis of foodborne salmonella-the study of mini-modified semi solid rappaport vassiliadis most probable number method].
Zhang D; Liao XG; Guo YC; Zhang XL; Chuan HX; Cui Y
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 May; 47(5):452-4. PubMed ID: 23958131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of sample preparation and bacterial concentration on Salmonella enterica detection in poultry meat using culture methods and PCR assaying of preenrichment broths.
Kanki M; Sakata J; Taguchi M; Kumeda Y; Ishibashi M; Kawai T; Kawatsu K; Yamasaki W; Inoue K; Miyahara M
Food Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19028296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of different sampling techniques and enumeration methods for the isolation and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in raw retail chicken legs.
Scherer K; Bartelt E; Sommerfeld C; Hildebrandt G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. PCR detection and microbiological isolation of Salmonella spp. from fresh beef and cantaloupes.
Gallegos-Robles MA; Morales-Loredo A; Alvarez-Ojeda G; Osuna-García JA; Martínez IO; Morales-Ramos LH; Fratamico P
J Food Sci; 2009; 74(1):M37-40. PubMed ID: 19200105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of pre-enrichment protocol on the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for detection of naturally contaminated Salmonella in raw poultry compared to conventional culture.
Myint MS; Johnson YJ; Tablante NL; Heckert RA
Food Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 23(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16943057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of direct colony count methods and the MPN-method for quantitative detection of Listeria in model and field conditions].
Hildebrandt G; Schott W
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001; 114(11-12):453-64. PubMed ID: 11766274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of motility enrichment on modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiladis medium (MSRV) for the detection of Salmonella in foods.
Worcman-Barnink D; Destro MT; Fernandes SA; Landgraf M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 64(3):387-93. PubMed ID: 11294362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and evaluation of DNA and RNA real-time assays for food analysis using the hilA gene of Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica.
McCabe EM; Burgess CM; O'Regan E; McGuinness S; Barry T; Fanning S; Duffy G
Food Microbiol; 2011 May; 28(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 21356450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of an automated ELFA and two different real-time PCR techniques for Salmonella detection in poultry samples.
Rohonczy K; Zoller L; Hermann Z; Fodor A; Mráz B; Tabajdi-Pintér V
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung; 2014 Sep; 61(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 25261941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Salmonella species in foodstuffs.
Bhagwat AA; Patel J; Chua T; Chan A; Cruz SR; Aguilar GA
Methods Mol Biol; 2008; 429():33-43. PubMed ID: 18695957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid detection of Salmonella from hydrodynamic pressure-treated poultry using molecular beacon real-time PCR.
Patel JR; Bhagwat AA; Sanglay GC; Solomon MB
Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 16942984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The evaluation of a fluorogenic polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Salmonella species in food commodities.
Chen S; Yee A; Griffiths M; Larkin C; Yamashiro CT; Behari R; Paszko-Kolva C; Rahn K; De Grandis SA
Int J Food Microbiol; 1997 Apr; 35(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 9105933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distribution and genotypic characterization of Salmonella serovars isolated from tropical seafood of Cochin, India.
Kumar R; Surendran PK; Thampuran N
J Appl Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 106(2):515-24. PubMed ID: 19200318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of Salmonella species in various raw meat samples of a local market in Kathmandu.
Maharjan M; Joshi V; Joshi DD; Manandhar P
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Oct; 1081():249-56. PubMed ID: 17135520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EMA-real-time PCR as a reliable method for detection of viable Salmonella in chicken and eggs.
Wang L; Mustapha A
J Food Sci; 2010 Apr; 75(3):M134-9. PubMed ID: 20492302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct and quantitative analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium using real-time PCR from artificially contaminated chicken meat.
Park HJ; Kim HJ; Park SH; Shin EG; Kim JH; Kim HY
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Aug; 18(8):1453-8. PubMed ID: 18756108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved bioluminescent enzyme immunoassay for the rapid detection of Salmonella in chicken meat samples.
Fukuda S; Tatsumi H; Igimi S; Yamamoto S
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2005; 41(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 16238639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sequencing of an internal transcribed spacer region of 16S-23S rRNA gene and designing of PCR primers for the detection of Salmonella spp. in food.
Chiu TH; Chen TR; Hwang WZ; Tsen HY
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Jan; 97(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 15582736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella spp. in food: An alternative approach to a conventional PCR system suggested by the FOOD-PCR project.
Hein I; Flekna G; Krassnig M; Wagner M
J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Sep; 66(3):538-47. PubMed ID: 16564585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
