501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22417748)
1. Replication fork dynamics and the DNA damage response.
Jones RM; Petermann E
Biochem J; 2012 Apr; 443(1):13-26. PubMed ID: 22417748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
Tourrière H; Pasero P
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A postincision-deficient TFIIH causes replication fork breakage and uncovers alternative Rad51- or Pol32-mediated restart mechanisms.
Moriel-Carretero M; Aguilera A
Mol Cell; 2010 Mar; 37(5):690-701. PubMed ID: 20227372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.
Andreassen PR; Ho GP; D'Andrea AD
Carcinogenesis; 2006 May; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stabilizing and remodeling the blocked DNA replication fork: anchoring FANCM and the Fanconi anemia damage response.
Thompson LH; Jones NJ
Mol Cell; 2010 Mar; 37(6):749-51. PubMed ID: 20347418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanisms of dealing with DNA damage-induced replication problems.
Budzowska M; Kanaar R
Cell Biochem Biophys; 2009; 53(1):17-31. PubMed ID: 19034694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA damage response and transcription.
Lagerwerf S; Vrouwe MG; Overmeer RM; Fousteri MI; Mullenders LH
DNA Repair (Amst); 2011 Jul; 10(7):743-50. PubMed ID: 21622031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
Vázquez MV; Rojas V; Tercero JA
DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1.
Cobb JA; Bjergbaek L; Shimada K; Frei C; Gasser SM
EMBO J; 2003 Aug; 22(16):4325-36. PubMed ID: 12912929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
Lambert S; Carr AM
Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation.
McGlynn P; Lloyd RG
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(15):8227-34. PubMed ID: 11459957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.
Michel B; Grompone G; Florès MJ; Bidnenko V
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Aug; 101(35):12783-8. PubMed ID: 15328417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The DNA damage response during DNA replication.
Branzei D; Foiani M
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2005 Dec; 17(6):568-75. PubMed ID: 16226452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.
Meister P; Taddei A; Vernis L; Poidevin M; Gasser SM; Baldacci G
J Cell Biol; 2005 Feb; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15716375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods to study replication fork collapse in budding yeast.
Liberi G; Cotta-Ramusino C; Lopes M; Sogo J; Conti C; Bensimon A; Foiani M
Methods Enzymol; 2006; 409():442-62. PubMed ID: 16793417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic instability in cancer cells by impaired cell cycle checkpoints.
Nakanishi M; Shimada M; Niida H
Cancer Sci; 2006 Oct; 97(10):984-9. PubMed ID: 16925578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation.
Bartek J; Lukas J
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2007 Apr; 19(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 17303408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensing, signaling, and responding to DNA damage: organization of the checkpoint pathways in mammalian cells.
Li L; Zou L
J Cell Biochem; 2005 Feb; 94(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 15578575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stalled replication forks: making ends meet for recognition and stabilization.
Masai H; Tanaka T; Kohda D
Bioessays; 2010 Aug; 32(8):687-97. PubMed ID: 20658707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bloom syndrome, genomic instability and cancer: the SOS-like hypothesis.
Amor-Guéret M
Cancer Lett; 2006 May; 236(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 15950375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
