These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22417868)

  • 1. Prediction of the mechanical response of the femur with uncertain elastic properties.
    Wille H; Rank E; Yosibash Z
    J Biomech; 2012 Apr; 45(7):1140-8. PubMed ID: 22417868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-specific finite-element analyses of the proximal femur with orthotropic material properties validated by experiments.
    Trabelsi N; Yosibash Z
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jun; 133(6):061001. PubMed ID: 21744921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments.
    Yosibash Z; Padan R; Joskowicz L; Milgrom C
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Jun; 129(3):297-309. PubMed ID: 17536896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations.
    Yosibash Z; Trabelsi N; Milgrom C
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(16):3688-99. PubMed ID: 17706228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In situ parameter identification of optimal density-elastic modulus relationships in subject-specific finite element models of the proximal femur.
    Cong A; Buijs JO; Dragomir-Daescu D
    Med Eng Phys; 2011 Mar; 33(2):164-73. PubMed ID: 21030287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual density-elasticity relationships improve accuracy of subject-specific finite element models of human femurs.
    Eberle S; Göttlinger M; Augat P
    J Biomech; 2013 Sep; 46(13):2152-7. PubMed ID: 23895895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Verified and validated finite element analyses of humeri.
    Dahan G; Trabelsi N; Safran O; Yosibash Z
    J Biomech; 2016 May; 49(7):1094-1102. PubMed ID: 26972763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation to determine if a single validated density-elasticity relationship can be used for subject specific finite element analyses of human long bones.
    Eberle S; Göttlinger M; Augat P
    Med Eng Phys; 2013 Jul; 35(7):875-83. PubMed ID: 23010570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
    Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of bone demineralization due to the use of exoprosthesis by comparing Young's modulus of the femur in unilateral transfemoral amputees.
    Ramírez JF; Isaza JA; Mariaka I; Vélez JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 22005351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis.
    Taylor WR; Roland E; Ploeg H; Hertig D; Klabunde R; Warner MD; Hobatho MC; Rakotomanana L; Clift SE
    J Biomech; 2002 Jun; 35(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 12020996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion.
    Varghese B; Short D; Penmetsa R; Goswami T; Hangartner T
    J Biomech; 2011 Apr; 44(7):1374-9. PubMed ID: 21288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation.
    Bourne BC; van der Meulen MC
    J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):613-21. PubMed ID: 15046990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finite element analysis of a femur to deconstruct the paradox of bone curvature.
    Jade S; Tamvada KH; Strait DS; Grosse IR
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 341():53-63. PubMed ID: 24099719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of mechanical properties of cortical bone by quantitative computed tomography.
    Duchemin L; Bousson V; Raossanaly C; Bergot C; Laredo JD; Skalli W; Mitton D
    Med Eng Phys; 2008 Apr; 30(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 17596993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new method to evaluate the elastic modulus of cortical bone by using a combined computed tomography and finite element approach.
    Huang HL; Tsai MT; Lin DJ; Chien CS; Hsu JT
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 Apr; 40(4):464-8. PubMed ID: 20304390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new approach to determine the accuracy of morphology-elasticity relationships in continuum FE analyses of human proximal femur.
    Hazrati Marangalou J; Ito K; van Rietbergen B
    J Biomech; 2012 Nov; 45(16):2884-92. PubMed ID: 23017379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements.
    Taddei F; Schileo E; Helgason B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 17169598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image.
    Väänänen SP; Isaksson H; Julkunen P; Sirola J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 20809392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.