These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22419744)

  • 1. Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment.
    Kirkegaard K; Agerholm IE; Ingerslev HJ
    Hum Reprod; 2012 May; 27(5):1277-85. PubMed ID: 22419744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is morphokinetic analysis the answer?
    Aparicio B; Cruz M; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Dec; 27(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 24135156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Non-invasive embryo evaluation and selection using time-lapse monitoring: Results of a randomized controlled study.
    Kovacs P; Matyas S; Forgacs V; Sajgo A; Molnar L; Pribenszky C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():58-63. PubMed ID: 30580224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New approaches to embryo selection.
    Montag M; Toth B; Strowitzki T
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Nov; 27(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 23933036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which morphological scoring system is relevant in human embryo development?
    Montag M; Liebenthron J; Köster M
    Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S252-6. PubMed ID: 21782239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantification of embryo quality by respirometry.
    Lopes AS; Greve T; Callesen H
    Theriogenology; 2007 Jan; 67(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 17109946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Morphological systems of human embryo assessment and clinical evidence.
    Machtinger R; Racowsky C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Mar; 26(3):210-21. PubMed ID: 23352813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing the best embryo by time lapse versus standard morphology.
    Kirkegaard K; Ahlström A; Ingerslev HJ; Hardarson T
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 25527231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time-lapse cinematography-compatible polystyrene-based microwell culture system: a novel tool for tracking the development of individual bovine embryos.
    Sugimura S; Akai T; Somfai T; Hirayama M; Aikawa Y; Ohtake M; Hattori H; Kobayashi S; Hashiyada Y; Konishi K; Imai K
    Biol Reprod; 2010 Dec; 83(6):970-8. PubMed ID: 20739661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research.
    Wong C; Chen AA; Behr B; Shen S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Feb; 26(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 23273754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.
    Sundvall L; Ingerslev HJ; Breth Knudsen U; Kirkegaard K
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3215-21. PubMed ID: 24070998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing of cell division in human cleavage-stage embryos is linked with blastocyst formation and quality.
    Cruz M; Garrido N; Herrero J; Pérez-Cano I; Muñoz M; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Oct; 25(4):371-81. PubMed ID: 22877944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Does embryo morphology constitute a reliable criterion for embryo selection?].
    Scalici E; Gala A; Ferrières A; Vincens C; Hamamah S
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Sep; 42(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 25153441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-lapse embryo imaging and morphokinetic profiling: Towards a general characterisation of embryogenesis.
    Mandawala AA; Harvey SC; Roy TK; Fowler KE
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2016 Nov; 174():2-10. PubMed ID: 27720247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation.
    Meseguer M; Herrero J; Tejera A; Hilligsøe KM; Ramsing NB; Remohí J
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Oct; 26(10):2658-71. PubMed ID: 21828117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Focus on time-lapse analysis: blastocyst collapse and morphometric assessment as new features of embryo viability.
    Sciorio R; Meseguer M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 Nov; 43(5):821-832. PubMed ID: 34593324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of the promises and pitfalls of oocyte and embryo metabolomics.
    Nel-Themaat L; Nagy ZP
    Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S257-63. PubMed ID: 21703683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers.
    Van Montfoort AP; Dumoulin JC; Kester AD; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):2103-8. PubMed ID: 15243008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Porcine embryo development and fragmentation and their relation to apoptotic markers: a cinematographic and confocal laser scanning microscopic study.
    Mateusen B; Van Soom A; Maes DG; Donnay I; Duchateau L; Lequarre AS
    Reproduction; 2005 Apr; 129(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 15798019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling as an adjunct to morphology for noninvasive embryo assessment in women undergoing single embryo transfer.
    Seli E; Vergouw CG; Morita H; Botros L; Roos P; Lambalk CB; Yamashita N; Kato O; Sakkas D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jul; 94(2):535-42. PubMed ID: 19589524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.