These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22419744)

  • 21. Morphological assessment of embryo viability.
    Abeyta M; Behr B
    Semin Reprod Med; 2014 Mar; 32(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 24515906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Time-lapse videography for embryo selection/de-selection: a bright future or fading star?
    Liu Y; Sakkas D; Afnan M; Matson P
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2020 Jun; 23(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 30963781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of gender-specific human embryo development characteristics by time-lapse technology.
    Serdarogullari M; Findikli N; Goktas C; Sahin O; Ulug U; Yagmur E; Bahceci M
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Aug; 29(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 24925308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recurrent implantation failure: gamete and embryo factors.
    Das M; Holzer HE
    Fertil Steril; 2012 May; 97(5):1021-7. PubMed ID: 22425200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computer-assisted embryo selection: a benefit in the evaluation of embryo quality?
    Paternot G; Debrock S; D'Hooghe T; Spiessens C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Sep; 23(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 21782515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Morphometric analysis of human embryos to predict developmental competence.
    Ziebe S
    Reprod Fertil Dev; 2013; 26(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 24305177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of human embryo culture media using Raman spectroscopy predicts embryonic reproductive potential: a prospective blinded pilot study.
    Scott R; Seli E; Miller K; Sakkas D; Scott K; Burns DH
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jul; 90(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 18281045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The use of time lapse photography in an in vitro fertilization programme for better selection for embryo transfer.
    Kovačič B; Hojnik N; Vlaisavljević V
    J Stem Cells; 2014; 9(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 25158088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How should we choose the 'best' embryo? A commentary on behalf of the British Fertility Society and the Association of Clinical Embryologists.
    Bolton VN; Leary C; Harbottle S; Cutting R; Harper JC
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2015 Sep; 18(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 26313607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of morphokinetic as a predictor of implantation.
    Tejera A; Aparicio-Ruiz B; Meseguer M
    Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Dec; 69(6):555-567. PubMed ID: 28643503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pregnancy achieved by transfer of a single blastocyst selected by time-lapse monitoring.
    Pribenszky C; Mátyás S; Kovács P; Losonczi E; Zádori J; Vajta G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Oct; 21(4):533-6. PubMed ID: 20638906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of in-vitro developmental competence of early cleavage-stage mouse embryos with compact time-lapse equipment.
    Pribenszky C; Losonczi E; Molnár M; Lang Z; Mátyás S; Rajczy K; Molnár K; Kovács P; Nagy P; Conceicao J; Vajta G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Mar; 20(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 20089456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Time lapse (Embryoscope®) as a routine technique in the IVF laboratory: a useful tool for better embryo selection?].
    Freour T; Lammers J; Splingart C; Jean M; Barriere P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Sep; 40(9):476-80. PubMed ID: 22901784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Noninvasive metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media using proton nuclear magnetic resonance correlates with reproductive potential of embryos in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.
    Seli E; Botros L; Sakkas D; Burns DH
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Dec; 90(6):2183-9. PubMed ID: 18842260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Which embryo selection method should be offered to the patients?
    Kovacs P; Lieman HJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Apr; 36(4):603-605. PubMed ID: 30953231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of human embryo development using morphological criteria in an era of time-lapse, algorithms and 'OMICS': is looking good still important?
    Gardner DK; Balaban B
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 22(10):704-718. PubMed ID: 27578774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability markers.
    Lundin K; Ahlström A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Oct; 31(4):459-71. PubMed ID: 26277586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selection of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse microscopy in in vitro fertilization: State of the technology and future directions.
    Aparicio-Ruiz B; Romany L; Meseguer M
    Birth Defects Res; 2018 May; 110(8):648-653. PubMed ID: 29714056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Predictive value of embryo grading for embryos with known outcomes.
    Weitzman VN; Schnee-Riesz J; Benadiva C; Nulsen J; Siano L; Maier D
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):658-62. PubMed ID: 19410247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing efficacy of day 3 embryo time-lapse algorithms retrospectively: impacts of dataset type and confounding factors.
    Liu Y; Feenan K; Chapple V; Matson P
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2019 Sep; 22(3):182-190. PubMed ID: 29338469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.