These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22419744)
41. Selection of high-potential embryos by culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) microwells and time-lapse imaging. Hashimoto S; Kato N; Saeki K; Morimoto Y Fertil Steril; 2012 Feb; 97(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 22217963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (>or=10 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogma. Luna M; Copperman AB; Duke M; Ezcurra D; Sandler B; Barritt J Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 17531231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The influence of patient and cohort parameters on the incidence and developmental potential of embryos with poor quality traits for use in human embryonic stem cell derivation. O'Leary T; Duggal G; Lierman S; Van den Abbeel E; Heindryckx B; De Sutter P Hum Reprod; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1581-9. PubMed ID: 22442247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Research progress of time-lapse imaging technology and embryonic development potential: A review. Wang J; Guo Y; Zhang N; Li T Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Sep; 102(38):e35203. PubMed ID: 37746957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Bidault R; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Cadoret V; Jamet C; Royere D Hum Reprod; 2009 May; 24(5):1051-8. PubMed ID: 19218575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Introduction: nongenetic markers of oocyte and embryo competence. Meldrum DR Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):301-2. PubMed ID: 25639966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The application and impact of cryopreservation of early cleavage stage embryos in assisted reproduction. Edgar DH; Archer J; Bourne H Hum Fertil (Camb); 2005 Dec; 8(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 16393822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Time-lapse in the IVF-lab: how should we assess potential benefit? Armstrong S; Vail A; Mastenbroek S; Jordan V; Farquhar C Hum Reprod; 2015 Jan; 30(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 25316446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Prediction of embryo developmental potential and pregnancy based on early stage morphological characteristics. Sjöblom P; Menezes J; Cummins L; Mathiyalagan B; Costello MF Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):848-61. PubMed ID: 17027355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Does early morphology provide additional selection power to blastocyst selection for transfer? Guerif F; Lemseffer M; Leger J; Bidault R; Cadoret V; Chavez C; Gasnier O; Saussereau MH; Royere D Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Oct; 21(4):510-9. PubMed ID: 20817557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The ART of selecting the best embryo: A review of early embryonic mortality and bovine embryo viability assessment methods. Perkel KJ; Tscherner A; Merrill C; Lamarre J; Madan P Mol Reprod Dev; 2015 Nov; 82(11):822-38. PubMed ID: 26184077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Single in vitro bovine embryo production: coculture with autologous cumulus cells, developmental competence, embryo quality and gene expression profiles. Goovaerts IG; Leroy JL; Rizos D; Bermejo-Alvarez P; Gutierrez-Adan A; Jorssen EP; Bols PE Theriogenology; 2011 Oct; 76(7):1293-303. PubMed ID: 21752451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Temporal detection of caspase-3 and -7 in bovine in vitro produced embryos of different developmental capacity. Vandaele L; Mateusen B; Maes DG; de Kruif A; Van Soom A Reproduction; 2007 Apr; 133(4):709-18. PubMed ID: 17504915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Full in vitro fertilization laboratory mechanization: toward robotic assisted reproduction? Meseguer M; Kruhne U; Laursen S Fertil Steril; 2012 Jun; 97(6):1277-86. PubMed ID: 22480821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Role of the oviduct in early embryo development. Besenfelder U; Havlicek V; Brem G Reprod Domest Anim; 2012 Aug; 47 Suppl 4():156-63. PubMed ID: 22827365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Noninvasive imaging systems for gametes and embryo selection in IVF programs: a review. Omidi M; Faramarzi A; Agharahimi A; Khalili MA J Microsc; 2017 Sep; 267(3):253-264. PubMed ID: 28470749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Relationship between pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) and standard day 2 or 3 embryo morphology with regard to assisted reproductive technique outcomes. Payne JF; Raburn DJ; Couchman GM; Price TM; Jamison MG; Walmer DK Fertil Steril; 2005 Oct; 84(4):900-9. PubMed ID: 16213842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Human oocyte cryopreservation: a valid alternative to embryo cryopreservation? Tucker M; Morton P; Liebermann J Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113 Suppl 1():S24-7. PubMed ID: 15041126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]