These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22420106)

  • 1. Effect of respondent code location on survey response rate.
    King KA; Vidourek RA
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Dec; 109(3):718-22. PubMed ID: 22420106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response rates to surveys with self-addressed, stamped envelopes versus a self-addressed label.
    Groves BW; Olsson RH
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1226-8. PubMed ID: 10932585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of a college pen incentive on survey response rate among recent college graduates.
    Stange JP; Zyzanski SJ
    Eval Rev; 2011 Feb; 35(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 21362640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survey return rates for multiple-authored versus single-authored covering letters.
    Price JH; Khubchandani J; Bryant M; Rickard M; Hendershot C; Thompson A
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 20923065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Survey return rates using a covering letter signed by a graduate student or faculty member.
    Szirony TA; Price JH; Telljohann SK; Wolfe E
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Dec; 91(3 Pt 2):1174-6. PubMed ID: 12585532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates.
    Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing.
    Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of paper color and a monetary incentive on response rate.
    King KA; Vaughan JL
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Oct; 95(2):432-4. PubMed ID: 15587203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond.
    Sprague S; Quigley L; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():27-34. PubMed ID: 19411497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.
    Thorpe C; Ryan B; McLean SL; Burt A; Stewart M; Brown JB; Reid GJ; Harris S
    Fam Pract; 2009 Feb; 26(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19074758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic surveys: how to maximise success.
    McPeake J; Bateson M; O'Neill A
    Nurse Res; 2014 Jan; 21(3):24-6. PubMed ID: 24460562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of personalized prenotification on response rates to an electronic survey.
    Hart AM; Brennan CW; Sym D; Larson E
    West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18515752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect on survey return rates of having a signed or unsigned postcard as the third-wave mailing.
    Price JH; Dake JA; Akpanudo S; Kleinfelder J
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):1099-102. PubMed ID: 12931924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An example of maximizing survey return rates. Methodological issues for health professionals.
    Gore-Felton C; Koopman C; Bridges E; Thoresen C; Spiegel D
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Jun; 25(2):152-68. PubMed ID: 12026750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survey practices in dental education research.
    Creswell JW; Kuster CG
    J Dent Educ; 1983 Oct; 47(10):676-80. PubMed ID: 6578248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; McGettigan P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Aug; 14(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 15937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study.
    Deehan A; Templeton L; Taylor C; Drummond C; Strang J
    Br J Gen Pract; 1997 Feb; 47(415):87-90. PubMed ID: 9101691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mailed fecal immunochemical tests plus educational materials to improve colon cancer screening rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) practices.
    Levy BT; Daly JM; Xu Y; Ely JW
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2012; 25(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 22218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of small monetary incentives on return rates of a health survey to adults in rural areas.
    Price JH; Dake JA; Jordan TR; Silvestri KS; Ward BL
    Psychol Rep; 2006 Jun; 98(3):849-52. PubMed ID: 16933683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pre-notification did not increase response rate in addition to follow-up: a randomized trial.
    Hammink A; Giesen P; Wensing M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1276-8. PubMed ID: 20566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.