84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22420361)
1. [Factor analysis of ipsative data: a simulation study].
Gómez CX; Carvajal CC
Psicothema; 2012 May; 24(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 22420361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recovery of weak factor loadings in confirmatory factor analysis under conditions of model misspecification.
Ximénez C
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1038-52. PubMed ID: 19897812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using the Tukey-Kramer omnibus test in the Hayter-Fisher procedure.
Richter SJ; McCann MH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Nov; 65(3):499-510. PubMed ID: 22335527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes: a comparison of three approaches.
Jung S
Behav Processes; 2013 Jul; 97():90-5. PubMed ID: 23541772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploratory factor analysis for small samples.
Jung S; Lee S
Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):701-9. PubMed ID: 21431996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
Revuelta J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The analysis of very small samples of repeated measurements I: an adjusted sandwich estimator.
Skene SS; Kenward MG
Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(27):2825-37. PubMed ID: 20839367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatiotemporal EEG/MEG source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model.
Huizenga HM; de Munck JC; Waldorp LJ; Grasman RP
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Jun; 49(6):533-9. PubMed ID: 12046698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Graphical procedures for assessing person-fit in item factor analysis].
Ferrando Piera PJ; Morales Vives F
Psicothema; 2010 May; 22(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 20423642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bootstrap approach to inference and power analysis based on three test statistics for covariance structure models.
Yuan KH; Hayashi K
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 May; 56(Pt 1):93-110. PubMed ID: 12803824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
Sinharay S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A strategy for preclinical formulation development using GastroPlus as pharmacokinetic simulation tool and a statistical screening design applied to a dog study.
Kuentz M; Nick S; Parrott N; Röthlisberger D
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2006 Jan; 27(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 16219449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Confirmation of the three-factor model of the Assessing Emotions Scale (AES): verification of the theoretical starting point.
Kun B; Balazs H; Kapitany M; Urban R; Demetrovics Z
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):596-606. PubMed ID: 20479191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Covariance Structure Analysis of Partially Additive Ipsative Data Using Restricted Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
Chan W; Bentler PM
Multivariate Behav Res; 1996 Jul; 31(3):289-312. PubMed ID: 26741069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
Liu HY; Weng LJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
