BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22421525)

  • 1. Subspace electrode selection methodology for the reduction of the effect of uncertain conductivity values in the EEG dipole localization: a simulation study using a patient-specific head model.
    Crevecoeur G; Restrepo VM; Staelens S
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1963-86. PubMed ID: 22421525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduced conductivity dependence method for increase of dipole localization accuracy in the EEG inverse problem.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupre L
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1430-40. PubMed ID: 21257364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Subspace electrode selection methodology for EEG multiple source localization error reduction due to uncertain conductivity values.
    Crevecoeur G; Yitembe B; Dupre L; Van Keer R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6191-4. PubMed ID: 24111154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduction of the impact of multiple uncertain conductivity values on EEG dipole source analysis.
    Yitembe BR; Crevecoeur G; Van Keer R; Dupré L
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2013 Mar; 29(3):363-79. PubMed ID: 23345195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conventional and reciprocal approaches to the inverse dipole localization problem of electroencephalography.
    Finke S; Gulrajani RM; Gotman J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jun; 50(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 12814232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of tissue conductivity changes on the EEG signal in the human brain: a simulation study.
    Jochmann T; Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 20888205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study on the reference electrode standardization technique for a realistic head model.
    Zhai Y; Yao D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Dec; 76(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 15501509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of EEG source reconstruction in the presence of brain lesions: modelling errors and surface electrodes' placement.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():423-8. PubMed ID: 12085644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of dipole position, orientation and noise on the accuracy of EEG source localization.
    Whittingstall K; Stroink G; Gates L; Connolly JF; Finley A
    Biomed Eng Online; 2003 Jun; 2():14. PubMed ID: 12807534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A finite difference method with reciprocity used to incorporate anisotropy in electroencephalogram dipole source localization.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; D'Asseler Y; Lemahieu I; Van de Walle R
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3787-806. PubMed ID: 16077227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EEG localization accuracy improvements using realistically shaped head models.
    Cuffin BN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 8682542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forward and inverse problems of EEG dipole localization.
    Musha T; Okamoto Y
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1999; 27(3-5):189-239. PubMed ID: 10864280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of anisotropic conductivity on EEG source reconstruction: investigations in a rabbit model.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Eiselt M; Giessler F; Flemming L; Anwander A; Knösche TR; Wolters CH; Dümpelmann M; Tuch DS; Reichenbach JR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1841-50. PubMed ID: 16941840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probabilistic forward model for electroencephalography source analysis.
    Plis SM; George JS; Jun SC; Ranken DM; Volegov PL; Schmidt DM
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):5309-27. PubMed ID: 17762088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. General bounds for electrode mislocation on the EEG inverse problem.
    Beltrachini L; von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 20599288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of conductivity uncertainties and modeling errors on EEG source localization using a 2-D model.
    Awada KA; Jackson DR; Baumann SB; Williams JT; Wilton DR; Fink PW; Prasky BR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Sep; 45(9):1135-45. PubMed ID: 9735563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.