These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22422003)

  • 1. To hype, or not to(o) hype. Communication of science is often tarnished by sensationalization, for which both scientists and the media are responsible.
    Rinaldi A
    EMBO Rep; 2012 Apr; 13(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 22422003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hype and public trust in science.
    Master Z; Resnik DB
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2013 Jun; 19(2):321-35. PubMed ID: 22045550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spinning the Genome: Why Science Hype Matters.
    Caulfield T
    Perspect Biol Med; 2018; 61(4):560-571. PubMed ID: 30613038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving communication between scientists and the press.
    Birmingham K
    Nat Med; 1998 Mar; 4(3):258. PubMed ID: 9500585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Communication breakdown.
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7545):5. PubMed ID: 25832368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to (or not to) communicate science.
    Rose SP
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2003 Apr; 31(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 12653626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Science communication media for scientists and the public.
    Darzentas N; Goldovsky L; Ouzounis CA; Karapiperis K; Karapiperis C
    EMBO Rep; 2007 Oct; 8(10):886-7. PubMed ID: 17906664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Training scientists to be journalists. Clear and accessible writing is not good enough for the public. Above all, it has to have sparkle.
    Wilkes J
    EMBO Rep; 2002 Nov; 3(11):1005-8. PubMed ID: 12429606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can hype be a force for good?: Inviting unexpected engagement with science and technology futures.
    Roberson TM
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jul; 29(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32438851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hype and anti-hype in academic biogerontology research.
    de Grey AD
    Rejuvenation Res; 2010; 13(2-3):137-8. PubMed ID: 20462380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to make your podcast stand out in a crowded market.
    Kwok R
    Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7739):387-389. PubMed ID: 30647427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nutrition research in the media: the challenge facing scientists.
    Goldberg JP; Hellwig JP
    J Am Coll Nutr; 1997 Dec; 16(6):544-50. PubMed ID: 9430082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Human Genome Project: an examination of its challenge to the technological imperative.
    Koski CA
    New Genet Soc; 2005 Dec; 24(3):265-81. PubMed ID: 16610129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science communication in transition: genomics hype, public engagement, education and commercialization pressures.
    Bubela T
    Clin Genet; 2006 Nov; 70(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 17026631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NerveCenter: media focus on 'miracle cure' for cerebral palsy pits science vs. hype.
    Patoine B
    Ann Neurol; 2009 Oct; 66(4):A9-11. PubMed ID: 19847906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics Hype?
    Caulfield T
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2016 Sep; 46(5):13-6. PubMed ID: 27649824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Science communication reconsidered.
    Bubela T; Nisbet MC; Borchelt R; Brunger F; Critchley C; Einsiedel E; Geller G; Gupta A; Hampel J; Hyde-Lay R; Jandciu EW; Jones SA; Kolopack P; Lane S; Lougheed T; Nerlich B; Ogbogu U; O'Riordan K; Ouellette C; Spear M; Strauss S; Thavaratnam T; Willemse L; Caulfield T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Jun; 27(6):514-8. PubMed ID: 19513051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The social responsibility of scientists: the scientific impact statement.
    Walter C; Richards EP
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1998; 17(6):94-5. PubMed ID: 9824769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public communication of science 2.0: Is the communication of science via the "new media" online a genuine transformation or old wine in new bottles?
    Peters HP; Dunwoody S; Allgaier J; Lo YY; Brossard D
    EMBO Rep; 2014 Jul; 15(7):749-53. PubMed ID: 24920610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicating Science: Lessons from Film.
    Berlin HA
    Trends Immunol; 2016 Apr; 37(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 26988314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.