165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22422223)
1. Two nations divided by a common purpose.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2012 Mar; 483(7389):247. PubMed ID: 22422223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. One in four.
Richardson C
Ment Health Today; 2003 Nov; ():12-3. PubMed ID: 14689595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Press before paper--when media and science collide.
Stewart CN
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 12665812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clarifying press before paper.
Snow AA; Pilson D
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):597-8. PubMed ID: 12776136
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. When balance is bias.
Jackson T
BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8006. PubMed ID: 22187191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. World view: Calling science to account.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2010 Feb; 463(7283):875. PubMed ID: 20164898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientist-versus-activist debates mislead the public.
Lewis SL
Nature; 2014 Feb; 506(7489):409. PubMed ID: 24572388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science communication. Interactions with the mass media.
Peters HP; Brossard D; de Cheveigné S; Dunwoody S; Kallfass M; Miller S; Tsuchida S
Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5886):204-5. PubMed ID: 18625578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Don't shoot the messenger.
Gibbons M; Bell A; Gale E; Corry P
Ment Health Today; 2005 Dec-2006 Jan; ():25-8. PubMed ID: 16379476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How to beat the media in the climate street fight.
Lewis SL
Nature; 2010 Nov; 468(7320):7. PubMed ID: 21048720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dealing with the media.
Gardner C; Pickering P
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20 Suppl():BE67-9. PubMed ID: 12089594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The challenges of science journalism: The perspectives of scientists, science communication advisors and journalists from New Zealand.
Ashwell DJ
Public Underst Sci; 2016 Apr; 25(3):379-93. PubMed ID: 25387869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Science journalism: Supplanting the old media?
Brumfiel G
Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7236):274-7. PubMed ID: 19295582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Science journalism: a delicate balancing act.
Lancet; 2011 Jul; 378(9789):374. PubMed ID: 21803191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Media, law, and the public's health.
Harp TN; McKenna M; Shute N
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4 Suppl):64-5. PubMed ID: 16689163
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anecdotal obsessions? A comment on the use of anecdotes by the general media to support claims in CAM.
Ernst E
Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery; 2004 Nov; 10(4):254-5. PubMed ID: 15519945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Embryos, words, and numbers: the ethical treatment of opinion.
Green JB
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):7-9; discussion W31-2. PubMed ID: 15035919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Media affect opinions less than they would like.
Melchett P
Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7019):799. PubMed ID: 15602522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Public communication of science in Mexico: past, present and future of a profession.
Sánchez-Mora C; Reynoso-Haynes E; Sánchez Mora AM; Tagüeña Parga J
Public Underst Sci; 2015 Jan; 24(1):38-52. PubMed ID: 24789844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dabbling in science journalism.
Nordquist L
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):760. PubMed ID: 16506320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
