148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22423720)
1. Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German.
Mennen I; Schaeffler F; Docherty G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2249-60. PubMed ID: 22423720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Categorical perception of intonation contrasts: effects of listeners' language background.
Liu C; Rodriguez A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):EL427-33. PubMed ID: 22713017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin.
Keating P; Kuo G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1050-60. PubMed ID: 22894225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English.
Cheang HS; Pell MD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1394-405. PubMed ID: 19739753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Voice pitch characteristics of Cantonese and English produced by Cantonese-English bilingual children.
Ng ML; Hsueh G; Sam Leung CS
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Jun; 12(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 20433341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The perception of intonation questions and statements in Cantonese.
Ma JK; Ciocca V; Whitehill TL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):1012-23. PubMed ID: 21361457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fundamental frequency in monolingual English, bilingual English/Russian, and bilingual English/Cantonese young adult women.
Altenberg EP; Ferrand CT
J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15990273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of alcoholic intoxication on the fundamental frequency of female and male speakers.
Baumeister B; Heinrich C; Schiel F
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):442-51. PubMed ID: 22779491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-language identification of long-term average speech spectra in Korean and English: toward a better understanding of the quantitative difference between two languages.
Noh H; Lee DH
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):441-3. PubMed ID: 22546728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fundamental frequency characteristics of Jordanian Arabic speakers.
Natour YS; Wingate JM
J Voice; 2009 Sep; 23(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 18640820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults.
Männel C; Friederici AD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 21(10):1988-2006. PubMed ID: 19296725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The language- specific interdependence of tonal and durational cues in perceived rhythmicality.
Cumming RE
Phonetica; 2011; 68(1-2):1-25. PubMed ID: 21804331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Native language affects rhythmic grouping of speech.
Bhatara A; Boll-Avetisyan N; Unger A; Nazzi T; Höhle B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3828-43. PubMed ID: 24180792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proficiency in English sentence stress production by Cantonese speakers who speak English as a second language (ESL).
Ng ML; Chen Y
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 21793782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundamental Frequency Range in Japanese and English: The Case of Simultaneous Bilinguals.
Graham C
Phonetica; 2014; 71(4):271-95. PubMed ID: 25997935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pitch control in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese.
Yan N; Lam PK; Ng ML
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 23051971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speaking a foreign language and its effect on F0.
Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Aaltonen O
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Jul; 38(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 22612530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Coding of intonational meanings beyond F0: evidence from utterance-final /t/ aspiration in German.
Niebuhr O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1252-63. PubMed ID: 18681611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relative power of harmonics in human frequency-following responses associated with voice pitch in American and Chinese adults.
Jeng FC; Costilow CE; Stangherlin DP; Lin CD
Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 21987910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
