148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22423724)
1. Estimating concentration of ultrasound contrast agents with backscatter coefficients: experimental and theoretical aspects.
Leithem SM; Lavarello RJ; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2295-305. PubMed ID: 22423724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.
Radhakrishnan K; Bader KB; Haworth KJ; Kopechek JA; Raymond JL; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6541-63. PubMed ID: 24002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.
Chitnis PV; Koppolu S; Mamou J; Chlon C; Ketterling JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 23287913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic characterization of echogenic liposomes: frequency-dependent attenuation and backscatter.
Kopechek JA; Haworth KJ; Raymond JL; Douglas Mast T; Perrin SR; Klegerman ME; Huang S; Porter TM; McPherson DD; Holland CK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3472-81. PubMed ID: 22088022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surface modes and acoustic scattering of microspheres and ultrasound contrast agents.
Falou O; Jafari Sojahrood A; Kumaradas JC; Kolios MC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1820-9. PubMed ID: 22978909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental assessment of four ultrasound scattering models for characterizing concentrated tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Franceschini E; Guillermin R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3735-47. PubMed ID: 23231104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
Koppolu S; Chitnis PV; Mamou J; Allen JS; Ketterling JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Mar; 62(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 25935932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cumulative phase delay imaging for contrast-enhanced ultrasound tomography.
Demi L; van Sloun RJ; Wijkstra H; Mischi M
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 60(21):L23-33. PubMed ID: 26459771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficients for weakly scattering, agar spheres in agar phantoms.
King MR; Anderson JJ; Herd MT; Ma D; Haak A; Wirtzfeld LA; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Oelze ML; Hall TJ; O'Brien WD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):903-8. PubMed ID: 20707460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absolute backscatter coefficient estimates of tissue-mimicking phantoms in the 5-50 MHz frequency range.
McCormick MM; Madsen EL; Deaner ME; Varghese T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):737-43. PubMed ID: 21877789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.
Lavarello RJ; Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):2903-11. PubMed ID: 21568393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The angiogenic response is dependent on ultrasound contrast agent concentration.
Johnson CA; O'Brien WD
Vasc Cell; 2012 May; 4():10. PubMed ID: 22587914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Enhanced heat deposition using ultrasound contrast agent--modeling and experimental observations.
Razansky D; Einziger PD; Adam DR
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Jan; 53(1):137-47. PubMed ID: 16471440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.
Bader KB; Holland CK
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(1):127-44. PubMed ID: 23221109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
