These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22424156)

  • 21. Extra precision docking, free energy calculation and molecular dynamics simulation studies of CDK2 inhibitors.
    Tripathi SK; Muttineni R; Singh SK
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Oct; 334():87-100. PubMed ID: 23727278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Flexible receptor docking for drug discovery.
    Wong CF
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015; 10(11):1189-200. PubMed ID: 26313123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploring the conformational space of a receptor for drug design: An ERα case study.
    Schneider M; Pons JL; Labesse G
    J Mol Graph Model; 2021 Nov; 108():107974. PubMed ID: 34274728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Exploring ligand dynamics in protein crystal structures with ensemble refinement.
    Caldararu O; Ekberg V; Logan DT; Oksanen E; Ryde U
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2021 Aug; 77(Pt 8):1099-1115. PubMed ID: 34342282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Allosteric conversation in the androgen receptor ligand-binding domain surfaces.
    Grosdidier S; Carbó LR; Buzón V; Brooke G; Nguyen P; Baxter JD; Bevan C; Webb P; Estébanez-Perpiñá E; Fernández-Recio J
    Mol Endocrinol; 2012 Jul; 26(7):1078-90. PubMed ID: 22653923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Molecular Dynamics-Shared Pharmacophore Approach to Boost Early-Enrichment Virtual Screening: A Case Study on Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α.
    Perricone U; Wieder M; Seidel T; Langer T; Padova A; Almerico AM; Tutone M
    ChemMedChem; 2017 Aug; 12(16):1399-1407. PubMed ID: 28135036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of the explicit flexibility of the InhA enzyme from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in molecular docking simulations.
    Cohen EM; Machado KS; Cohen M; de Souza ON
    BMC Genomics; 2011 Dec; 12 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S7. PubMed ID: 22369213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ensemble learning from ensemble docking: revisiting the optimum ensemble size problem.
    Mohammadi S; Narimani Z; Ashouri M; Firouzi R; Karimi-Jafari MH
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):410. PubMed ID: 35013496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
    Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improved docking, screening and selectivity prediction for small molecule nuclear receptor modulators using conformational ensembles.
    Park SJ; Kufareva I; Abagyan R
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2010 May; 24(5):459-71. PubMed ID: 20455005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enhancing Virtual Screening Performance of Protein Kinases with Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Offutt TL; Swift RV; Amaro RE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Oct; 56(10):1923-1935. PubMed ID: 27662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic Docking Using Multicanonical Molecular Dynamics: Simulating Complex Formation at the Atomistic Level.
    Bekker GJ; Kamiya N
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():187-202. PubMed ID: 33759128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Higher Accuracy Achieved for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction by Elastic Network Model-Based Ensemble Docking.
    Wang A; Zhang Y; Chu H; Liao C; Zhang Z; Li G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2939-2950. PubMed ID: 32383873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Virtual Screening Using Pharmacophore Models Retrieved from Molecular Dynamic Simulations.
    Polishchuk P; Kutlushina A; Bashirova D; Mokshyna O; Madzhidov T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 31757043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Exploration of the structural requirements of HIV-protease inhibitors using pharmacophore, virtual screening and molecular docking approaches for lead identification.
    Islam MA; Pillay TS
    J Mol Graph Model; 2015 Mar; 56():20-30. PubMed ID: 25541527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New scoring functions for virtual screening from molecular dynamics simulations with a quantum-refined force-field (QRFF-MD). Application to cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
    Ferrara P; Curioni A; Vangrevelinghe E; Meyer T; Mordasini T; Andreoni W; Acklin P; Jacoby E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):254-63. PubMed ID: 16426061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SDOCKER: a method utilizing existing X-ray structures to improve docking accuracy.
    Wu G; Vieth M
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3142-8. PubMed ID: 15163194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. HIV-1 TAR RNA spontaneously undergoes relevant apo-to-holo conformational transitions in molecular dynamics and constrained geometrical simulations.
    Fulle S; Christ NA; Kestner E; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Aug; 50(8):1489-501. PubMed ID: 20726603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. E-novo: an automated workflow for efficient structure-based lead optimization.
    Pearce BC; Langley DR; Kang J; Huang H; Kulkarni A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1797-809. PubMed ID: 19552372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.