232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22424253)
1. Socioeconomic status, energy cost, and nutrient content of supermarket food purchases.
Appelhans BM; Milliron BJ; Woolf K; Johnson TJ; Pagoto SL; Schneider KL; Whited MC; Ventrelle JC
Am J Prev Med; 2012 Apr; 42(4):398-402. PubMed ID: 22424253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positive attitude toward healthy eating predicts higher diet quality at all cost levels of supermarkets.
Aggarwal A; Monsivais P; Cook AJ; Drewnowski A
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 Feb; 114(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 23916974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Food and nutrient availability in New Zealand: an analysis of supermarket sales data.
Hamilton S; Mhurchu CN; Priest P
Public Health Nutr; 2007 Dec; 10(12):1448-55. PubMed ID: 17605835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. To what extent do food purchases reflect shoppers' diet quality and nutrient intake?
Appelhans BM; French SA; Tangney CC; Powell LM; Wang Y
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Apr; 14(1):46. PubMed ID: 28399887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental analysis of the effect of taxes and subsides on calories purchased in an on-line supermarket.
Epstein LH; Finkelstein E; Raynor H; Nederkoorn C; Fletcher KD; Jankowiak N; Paluch RA
Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():245-51. PubMed ID: 26145274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and discretionary foods among US adults by purchase location.
An R; Maurer G
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2016 Dec; 70(12):1396-1400. PubMed ID: 27507075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No Fat, No Sugar, No Salt . . . No Problem? Prevalence of "Low-Content" Nutrient Claims and Their Associations with the Nutritional Profile of Food and Beverage Purchases in the United States.
Taillie LS; Ng SW; Xue Y; Busey E; Harding M
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2017 Sep; 117(9):1366-1374.e6. PubMed ID: 28330730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Less-energy-dense diets of low-income women in California are associated with higher energy-adjusted diet costs.
Townsend MS; Aaron GJ; Monsivais P; Keim NL; Drewnowski A
Am J Clin Nutr; 2009 Apr; 89(4):1220-6. PubMed ID: 19225114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Are food and beverage purchases in households with preschoolers changing?: a longitudinal analysis from 2000 to 2011.
Ford CN; Ng SW; Popkin BM
Am J Prev Med; 2014 Sep; 47(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 25049217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Where people shop is not associated with the nutrient quality of packaged foods for any racial-ethnic group in the United States.
Stern D; Poti JM; Ng SW; Robinson WR; Gordon-Larsen P; Popkin BM
Am J Clin Nutr; 2016 Apr; 103(4):1125-34. PubMed ID: 26912495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Food purchasing selection among low-income, Spanish-speaking Latinos.
Cortés DE; Millán-Ferro A; Schneider K; Vega RR; Caballero AE
Am J Prev Med; 2013 Mar; 44(3 Suppl 3):S267-73. PubMed ID: 23415192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Highly Processed and Ready-to-Eat Packaged Food and Beverage Purchases Differ by Race/Ethnicity among US Households.
Poti JM; Mendez MA; Ng SW; Popkin BM
J Nutr; 2016 Sep; 146(9):1722-30. PubMed ID: 27466605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The dynamics in food selection stemming from price awareness and perceived income adequacy: a cross-sectional study using 1-year loyalty card data.
Fogelholm M; Vepsäläinen H; Meinilä J; McRae C; Saarijärvi H; Erkkola M; Nevalainen J
Am J Clin Nutr; 2024 May; 119(5):1346-1353. PubMed ID: 38458401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of supermarket receipts to estimate energy and fat content of food purchased by lean and overweight families.
Ransley JK; Donnelly JK; Botham H; Khara TN; Greenwood DC; Cade JE
Appetite; 2003 Oct; 41(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 14550311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of household supermarket sales data to estimate nutrient intakes: a comparison with repeat 24-hour dietary recalls.
Eyles H; Jiang Y; Ni Mhurchu C
J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Jan; 110(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 20102835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.
Hobin E; Bollinger B; Sacco J; Liebman E; Vanderlee L; Zuo F; Rosella L; L'abbe M; Manson H; Hammond D
Milbank Q; 2017 Sep; 95(3):494-534. PubMed ID: 28895220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Grocery Purchase Quality Index-2016 Performs Similarly to the Healthy Eating Index-2015 in a National Survey of Household Food Purchases.
Brewster PJ; Durward CM; Hurdle JF; Stoddard GJ; Guenther PM
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2019 Jan; 119(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 30413342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of a 25% discount on fruits and vegetables: results of a randomized trial in a three-dimensional web-based supermarket.
Waterlander WE; Steenhuis IH; de Boer MR; Schuit AJ; Seidell JC
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2012 Feb; 9():11. PubMed ID: 22316357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: a randomized controlled trial.
Ni Mhurchu C; Blakely T; Jiang Y; Eyles HC; Rodgers A
Am J Clin Nutr; 2010 Mar; 91(3):736-47. PubMed ID: 20042528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Higher nutritional quality at no additional cost among low-income households: insights from food purchases of "positive deviants".
Marty L; Dubois C; Gaubard MS; Maidon A; Lesturgeon A; Gaigi H; Darmon N
Am J Clin Nutr; 2015 Jul; 102(1):190-8. PubMed ID: 26016868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
