353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22424580)
1. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two and three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions.
Kan J; Gao X; Sandeep KG; Xu H; Zhao Y; Chen S; Chen F
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(6):1012-21. PubMed ID: 24622427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound for functional assessment of coronary lesions.
Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Sugimoto K; Takahara M; Kobayashi Y
J Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(1):280-286. PubMed ID: 27293021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of computed tomographic angiography for stenosis quantification using quantitative coronary angiography or intravascular ultrasound as the gold standard.
Joshi SB; Okabe T; Roswell RO; Weissman G; Lopez CF; Lindsay J; Pichard AD; Weissman NJ; Waksman R; Weigold WG
Am J Cardiol; 2009 Oct; 104(8):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19801022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve.
Yong AS; Ng AC; Brieger D; Lowe HC; Ng MK; Kritharides L
Eur Heart J; 2011 Feb; 32(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 20705695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing intermediate coronary lesions: angiographic prediction of lesion severity on intravascular ultrasound.
Fernandes MR; Silva GV; Caixeta A; Rati M; de Sousa e Silva NA; Perin EC
J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Oct; 19(10):412-6. PubMed ID: 17906342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography for the prediction of functional severity in true bifurcation lesions: Insights from the randomized DK-CRUSH II, III, and IV trials.
Zhang YJ; Zhu H; Shi SY; Muramatsu T; Pan DR; Ye F; Zhang JJ; Tian NL; Bourantas CV; Chen SL
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Mar; 87 Suppl 1():589-98. PubMed ID: 26876688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
Spoon DB; Rubinshtein R; Psaltis PJ; Sandhu GS; Lennon R; Rihal CS; Lerman A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound imaging for the measurement of cross-sectional luminal dimensions in intermediate coronary lesions.
Collingwood R; Bermudez E; Fischell TA
J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Jun; 22(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 19490355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing intermediate left main coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound.
Sano K; Mintz GS; Carlier SG; de Ribamar Costa J; Qian J; Missel E; Shan S; Franklin-Bond T; Boland P; Weisz G; Moussa I; Dangas GD; Mehran R; Lansky AJ; Kreps EM; Collins MB; Stone GW; Leon MB; Moses JW
Am Heart J; 2007 Nov; 154(5):983-8. PubMed ID: 17967608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between 3D-QCA based FFR and quantitative lumen assessment by IVUS for left main coronary artery stenoses.
Tomaniak M; Masdjedi K; van Zandvoort LJ; Neleman T; Tovar Forero MN; Vermaire A; Kochman J; Kardys I; den Dekker W; Wilschut J; Diletti R; de Jaegere P; Van Mieghem NM; Zijlstra F; Daemen J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Mar; 97(4):E495-E501. PubMed ID: 32725862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study).
Voros S; Rinehart S; Vazquez-Figueroa JG; Kalynych A; Karmpaliotis D; Qian Z; Joshi PH; Anderson H; Murrieta L; Wilmer C; Carlson H; Ballard W; Brown C
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jan; 113(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 24238960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis.
Ben-Dor I; Torguson R; Deksissa T; Bui AB; Xue Z; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2012; 13(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 22336532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Angiographically uncertain left main coronary artery narrowings: correlation with multidetector computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Dragu R; Kerner A; Gruberg L; Rispler S; Lessick J; Ghersin E; Litmanovich D; Engel A; Beyar R; Roguin A
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jun; 24(5):557-63. PubMed ID: 18165931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Coronary CT angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for estimation of coronary stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque burden: a meta-analysis.
Fischer C; Hulten E; Belur P; Smith R; Voros S; Villines TC
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 24148779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of coronary stenosis by dual source computed tomography in patients: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound and invasive angiography.
Feuchtner G; Loureiro R; Bezerra H; Rocha-Filho JA; Sarwar A; Pflederer T; Marwan M; Petranovic M; Raffel CO; Brady TB; Jang IK; Achenbach S; Cury RC
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 21227613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo comparison of key quantitative parameters measured with 3D peripheral angiography, 2D peripheral quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound.
Zasada W; Slezak M; Pociask E; Malinowski KP; Proniewska K; Buszman P; Milewski K; Granada JF; Kaluza GL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Feb; 35(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 30796556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limitations of intravascular ultrasound for the evaluation of coronary luminal area--comparison with quantitative angiography.
Iwami T; Fujii T; Miura T; Otani N; Matsuzaki M
Jpn Circ J; 1996 Aug; 60(8):575-84. PubMed ID: 8889660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
