These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22424580)

  • 61. Advanced 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis for prediction of fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses.
    Opolski MP; Pregowski J; Kruk M; Kepka C; Staruch AD; Witkowski A
    J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Jul; 29(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 24247083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Coronary disease morphology and distribution determined by quantitative angiography and intravascular ultrasound--re-evaluation in a cooperative multicenter intravascular ultrasound study (COMIUS).
    Yamagishi M; Hosokawa H; Saito S; Kanemitsu S; Chino M; Koyanagi S; Urasawa K; Ito K; Yo S; Honye J; Nakamura M; Matsumoto T; Kitabatake A; Takekoshi N; Yamaguchi T
    Circ J; 2002 Aug; 66(8):735-40. PubMed ID: 12197597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Value of intravascular ultrasound, 64 multi-detector computed tomography and quantitative coronary angiography on lesion of coronary artery in unstable angina pectoris patient].
    Jin ZN; Lü SZ; Chen YD; Yuan F; Song XT; Wu XF; Zhang LJ; Ren F; Ge CJ; Wang GZ; Xu XW
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 37(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 20193179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations.
    Koo BK; Yang HM; Doh JH; Choe H; Lee SY; Yoon CH; Cho YK; Nam CW; Hur SH; Lim HS; Yoon MH; Park KW; Na SH; Youn TJ; Chung WY; Ma S; Park SK; Kim HS; Tahk SJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 4(7):803-11. PubMed ID: 21777890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Intravascular ultrasound-based left main coronary artery assessment: comparison between pullback from left anterior descending and circumflex arteries.
    Suter Y; Schoenenberger AW; Toggweiler S; Jamshidi P; Resink T; Erne P
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Sep; 21(9):457-60. PubMed ID: 19726818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.
    Pyxaras SA; Tu S; Barbato E; Barbati G; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Mangiacapra F; Sinagra G; De Bruyne B; Reiber JH; Wijns W
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1010-1018.e1. PubMed ID: 24268215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Limits of quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) in intermediate stenosis measuring: a correlation and concordance study with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)].
    Ben Ahmed H; Bouzouita K; Hamdi I; Boussaid H; Mokaddem A; Ben Ameur Y; Boujnah MR
    Tunis Med; 2014 Jun; 92(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 25741837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Predictors for functionally significant in-stent restenosis: an integrated analysis using coronary angiography, IVUS, and myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Kang SJ; Cho YR; Park GM; Ahn JM; Han SB; Lee JY; Kim WJ; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Mintz GS; Park SJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1183-90. PubMed ID: 24229771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Validation by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography of a new method of analyzing coronary angiography quantitatively in coronary artery disease.
    McPherson DD; Johnson MR; Collins SM; Kieso RA; Marcus ML; Kerber RE
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Jan; 71(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 8420232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Usefulness of the Finet law to guide stent size selection in ostial left main stenting: Comparison with standard angiographic estimation.
    Rigatelli G; Zuin M; Ronco F; Caprioglio F; Cavazzini D; Giatti S; Braggion G; Perilli S; Nguyen VT
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Oct; 19(7 Pt A):751-754. PubMed ID: 29706477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Validation of minimal luminal area measured by intravascular ultrasound for assessment of functionally significant coronary stenosis comparison with myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Ahn JM; Kang SJ; Mintz GS; Oh JH; Kim WJ; Lee JY; Park DW; Lee SW; Kim YH; Lee CW; Park SW; Moon DH; Park SJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jun; 4(6):665-71. PubMed ID: 21700253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Left main coronary artery diameter - A correlation between intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.
    Goel PK; Liladhar Vora P; Kumar Sahu A; Khanna R
    Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(5):660-663. PubMed ID: 34627590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The impact of coronary artery disease risk factors on intravascular ultrasound-derived morphologic indices of human coronaries.
    Kahlon JP; Torey J; Nordstrom CK; LaLonde TA; Ali A; Schreiber TL; Ogawa T; Maciejko JJ; Rosman H; Gardin JM
    Echocardiography; 2006 Apr; 23(4):308-11. PubMed ID: 16640708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Quantitative computed tomographic coronary angiography: does it predict functionally significant coronary stenoses?
    Rossi A; Papadopoulou SL; Pugliese F; Russo B; Dharampal AS; Dedic A; Kitslaar PH; Broersen A; Meijboom WB; van Geuns RJ; Wragg A; Ligthart J; Schultz C; Petersen SE; Nieman K; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 24280729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A novel angiographic technique, StentBoost, in comparison with intravascular ultrasound to assess stent expansion.
    Yang FF; Zhang LW; Huang DS; Shen D; Sun HY; Zhang CH; Wang YM; Zhang XW; Bai J; Ma YJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Mar; 124(6):939-42. PubMed ID: 21518607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Impact of tissue characteristics on luminal narrowing of mild angiographic coronary stenosis: assessment of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound.
    Iwama M; Tanaka S; Noda T; Segawa T; Kawasaki M; Nishigaki K; Minagawa T; Watanabe S; Minatoguchi S
    Heart Vessels; 2014 Nov; 29(6):750-60. PubMed ID: 24154856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound parameters and fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis of left anterior descending artery: intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis.
    Yang HM; Tahk SJ; Lim HS; Yoon MH; Choi SY; Choi BJ; Jin XJ; Hwang GS; Park JS; Shin JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Feb; 83(3):386-94. PubMed ID: 23804359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance on directional coronary atherectomy.
    Koschyk DH; Nienaber CA; Schaps KP; Twisselmann T; Hofmann T; Lund GK; Langes K; Meinertz T
    Z Kardiol; 2000 Apr; 89(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 10868004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The relationship between intravascular ultrasound-derived percent total atheroma volume and fractional flow reserve in the intermediate stenosis of proximal or middle left anterior descending coronary artery.
    Jin XJ; Tahk SJ; Yang HM; Lim HS; Yoon MH; Choi SY; Choi BJ; Hwang GS; Seo KW; Shin JS; Lee YH; Choi YW; Park SJ; Park JS; Shin JH
    Int J Cardiol; 2015 Apr; 185():56-61. PubMed ID: 25791091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and angiographic assessment of coronary reference segment size in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Jensen LO; Thayssen P; Mintz GS; Egede R; Maeng M; Junker A; Galloee A; Christiansen EH; Pedersen KE; Hansen HS; Hansen KN
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(5):590-5. PubMed ID: 18308004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.