These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22424804)

  • 1. Biaxial microincision cataract surgery versus conventional coaxial cataract surgery: metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Yu JG; Zhao YE; Shi JL; Ye T; Jin N; Wang QM; Feng YF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 May; 38(5):894-901. PubMed ID: 22424804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision cataract surgery in complicated cases.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 20117707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bimanual microincision versus standard coaxial small-incision cataract surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Chen C; Zhu M; Sun Y; Qu X; Xu X
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 25363858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biaxial microincision versus coaxial small-incision clear cornea cataract surgery.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Gabriel P; Pfeiffer N; Dick HB
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Oct; 113(10):1818-26. PubMed ID: 17011959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Alió J; Rodríguez-Prats JL; Galal A; Ramzy M
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1997-2003. PubMed ID: 16183129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microincision versus small-incision coaxial cataract surgery using different power modes for hard nuclear cataract.
    Kim EC; Byun YS; Kim MS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1799-805. PubMed ID: 21839609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T; Sever O; Horozoglu F; Yasar M; Keskinbora KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlled clinical trial comparing biaxial microincision with coaxial small incision for cataract surgery.
    Dick HB
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(5):739-50. PubMed ID: 22267455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Coaxial, microcoaxial, and biaxial microincision cataract surgery: prospective comparative study.
    Can I; Takmaz T; Yildiz Y; Bayhan HA; Soyugelen G; Bostanci B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 May; 36(5):740-6. PubMed ID: 20457364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Piotr L; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19683153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Coaxial Microincision Cataract Surgery versus Standard Coaxial Small-Incision Cataract Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Shentu X; Zhang X; Tang X; Yu X
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146676. PubMed ID: 26745279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of early corneal endothelial cell loss after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and bimanual phacoemulsification through 1.7 mm microincision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1570-4. PubMed ID: 19683154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intraindividual comparison of surgical trauma after bimanual microincision and conventional small-incision coaxial phacoemulsification.
    Kahraman G; Amon M; Franz C; Prinz A; Abela-Formanek C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):618-22. PubMed ID: 17397733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical evaluation on the coaxial 1.8 mm microincision cataract surgery].
    Yao K; Wang W; Wu W; Tang XJ; Li ZC; Jin CF
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Oct; 47(10):903-7. PubMed ID: 22321500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for age-related cataract: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhang JY; Feng YF; Cai JQ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013; 41(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 22958062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microincision cataract surgery with toric intraocular lens implantation for correcting moderate and high astigmatism: pilot study.
    Alió JL; Agdeppa MC; Pongo VC; El Kady B
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 20117704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical coherence tomography of macular thickness after biaxial vs coaxial microincision clear corneal cataract surgery.
    Kurz S; Krummenauer F; Thieme H; Dick HB
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(6):990-7. PubMed ID: 19882577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of surgically induced astigmatism after coaxial phacoemulsification through 1.8 mm microincision and standard phacoemulsification through 2.75 mm incision.
    Wilczynski M; Supady E; Loba P; Synder A; Palenga-Pydyn D; Omulecki W
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(10-12):314-20. PubMed ID: 22384647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing the Curative Effects between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
    Chen X; Chen K; He J; Yao K
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152088. PubMed ID: 26999612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.