255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22425097)
1. Vaginal mesh explantation: an emerging urological discipline.
Winters JC
J Urol; 2012 May; 187(5):1529-30. PubMed ID: 22425097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: complications of vaginal mesh surgery.
Wein AJ
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):621. PubMed ID: 23845353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Indications and Complications Associated with the Removal of 506 Pieces of Vaginal Mesh Used in Pelvic Floor Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study.
Miklos JR; Chinthakanan O; Moore RD; Karp DR; Nogueiras GM; Davila GW
Surg Technol Int; 2016 Oct; 29():185-189. PubMed ID: 27780347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Use of synthetic slings and mesh implants in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and prolapse : Statement of the Working Group on Urological Functional Diagnostics and Female Urology of the Academy of the German Society of Urology].
Höfner K; Hampel C; Kirschner-Hermanns R; Alloussi SH; Bauer RM; Bross S; Bschleipfer T; Goepel M; Haferkamp A; Hüsch T; Kaufmann A; Kiss G; Kranz J; Oelke M; Pannek J; Reitz A; Rutkowski M; Schäfer W; Schulte-Baukloh H; Schumacher S; Seif C; Schultz-Lampel D
Urologe A; 2020 Jan; 59(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 31741004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What can we learn from the vaginal mesh story?
Karmakar D; Hayward L
Climacteric; 2019 Jun; 22(3):277-282. PubMed ID: 30829077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Erosions of the vaginal, bladder and urethral mucosa after transvaginal correction of genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence using synthetic materials].
Nechiporenko AN; Nechiporenko NA
Urologiia; 2013; (4):12-5. PubMed ID: 24159757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Persistent pelvic pain following transvaginal mesh surgery: a cause for mesh removal.
Marcus-Braun N; Bourret A; von Theobald P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jun; 162(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 22464208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications of vaginal mesh surgery.
Chermansky CJ; Winters JC
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 22617058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mesh sling in an era of uncertainty: lessons learned and the way forward.
Chapple CR; Raz S; Brubaker L; Zimmern PE
Eur Urol; 2013 Oct; 64(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 23856039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Concomitant Stress Incontinence Surgery at Time of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Since Release of the 2011 Notification on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Mesh.
Drain A; Khan A; Ohmann EL; Brucker BM; Smilen S; Rosenblum N; Nitti VW
J Urol; 2017 Apr; 197(4):1092-1098. PubMed ID: 27866958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications following the use of alloplastic materials in urogynecological surgery.
Renezeder K; Skala CE; Albrich S; Koelbl H; Naumann G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Oct; 158(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 21764504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Functional outcomes of synthetic tape and mesh revision surgeries: a monocentric experience.
Ismail S; Chartier-Kastler E; Reus C; Cohen J; Seisen T; Phé V
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 May; 30(5):805-813. PubMed ID: 30069725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence.
Kokanali MK; Doğanay M; Aksakal O; Cavkaytar S; Topçu HO; Özer İ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun; 177():146-50. PubMed ID: 24793930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FPMRS challenges on behalf of the Collaborative Research in Pelvic Surgery Consortium (CoRPS): managing complicated cases series 4: is taking out all of a mesh sling too extreme?
Rosenfeld EB; Yurteri-Kaplan LA; Maher C; Bazi T; Svabik K; Houlihan S; Grimes CL
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 31792592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Challenging the Myth: Transvaginal Mesh is Not Associated with Carcinogenesis.
Chughtai B; Sedrakyan A; Mao J; Thomas D; Eilber KS; Clemens JQ; Anger JT
J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):884-889. PubMed ID: 28479238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management of the Exposed or Perforated Midurethral Sling.
Giusto LL; Zahner PM; Goldman HB
Urol Clin North Am; 2019 Feb; 46(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30466700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Difference of opinion - Are syntetic slings safe? Opinion: Yes.
Cintra CC; Oliveira CE
Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):637-9. PubMed ID: 27564271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-Term Safety with Sling Mesh Implants for Stress Incontinence.
Chughtai B; Mao J; Matheny ME; Mauer E; Banerjee S; Sedrakyan A
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):183-190. PubMed ID: 32749936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Risk of Recurrent Urinary Incontinence Requiring Surgery After Suburethral Sling Removal for Mesh Complications.
Ramart P; Ackerman AL; Cohen SA; Kim JH; Raz S
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():203-209. PubMed ID: 28476681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Obturator foramen dissection for excision of symptomatic transobturator mesh.
Reynolds WS; Kit LC; Kaufman MR; Karram M; Bales GT; Dmochowski RR
J Urol; 2012 May; 187(5):1680-4. PubMed ID: 22425123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
