BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22425300)

  • 1. Large-diameter modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: incidence of revision for adverse reaction to metallic debris.
    Barrett WP; Kindsfater KA; Lesko JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):976-83.e1. PubMed ID: 22425300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Adams JB; Satterwhite KL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 26497881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disappointing short-term results with the DePuy ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Bernthal NM; Celestre PC; Stavrakis AI; Ludington JC; Oakes DA
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 22000575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Greater Trochanteric Fragmentation After Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Panichkul P; Fricka KB; Hopper RH; Engh CA
    Orthopedics; 2015 May; 38(5):e447-51. PubMed ID: 25970376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High rate of infection after aseptic revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Wyles CC; Van Demark RE; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Feb; 472(2):509-16. PubMed ID: 23846604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preoperative Risk Factors Associated With Poor Outcomes of Revision Surgery for "Pseudotumors" in Patients With Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
    Liow MH; Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2835-2842. PubMed ID: 27387480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High rate of revision and a high incidence of radiolucent lines around Metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacements: results from a randomised controlled trial of three bearings after seven years.
    Bjorgul K; Novicoff WN; Andersen ST; Ahlund OR; Bunes A; Wiig M; Brevig K
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 23814237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimum 5-year results of modular metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Kindsfater KA; Sychterz Terefenko CJ; Gruen TA; Sherman CM
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Apr; 27(4):545-50. PubMed ID: 21908166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cementless Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties at 13 years.
    Randelli F; Banci L; D'Anna A; Visentin O; Randelli G
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Feb; 27(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 21621954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gender is a significant factor for failure of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Latteier MJ; Berend KR; Lombardi AV; Ajluni AF; Seng BE; Adams JB
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):19-23. PubMed ID: 21641761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adverse reaction to metal debris after ReCap-M2A-Magnum large-diameter-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.
    Mokka J; Junnila M; Seppänen M; Virolainen P; Pölönen T; Vahlberg T; Mattila K; Tuominen EK; Rantakokko J; Aärimaa V; Kukkonen J; Mäkelä KT
    Acta Orthop; 2013 Dec; 84(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 24171688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a metal-on-metal bearing in patients younger than 50 years.
    Hwang KT; Kim YH; Kim YS; Choi IY
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1481-7. PubMed ID: 21414748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision total hip arthroplasty for ceramic head fracture: a long-term follow-up.
    Sharma V; Ranawat AS; Rasquinha VJ; Weiskopf J; Howard H; Ranawat CS
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 20347713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nationwide investigation into adverse tissue reactions to metal debris after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in Japan.
    Sugano N; Iida H; Akiyama H; Takatori Y; Nagoya S; Hasegawa M; Kabata T; Hachiya Y; Yasunaga Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2014 Jan; 19(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 24338047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: does early clinical outcome justify the chance of an adverse local tissue reaction?
    Engh CA; Ho H; Engh CA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Feb; 468(2):406-12. PubMed ID: 19727991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complications and re-revisions after revisions of 528 metal-on-metal hips because of adverse reaction to metal debris.
    Lainiala O; Reito A; Nieminen J; Eskelinen A
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Aug; 91(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 32285741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: dislocation infrequent but survivorship poor.
    Lombardi AV; Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Sneller MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):509-20. PubMed ID: 25367107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pseudotumour incidence, cobalt levels and clinical outcome after large head metal-on-metal and conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: mid-term results of a randomised controlled trial.
    van der Veen HC; Reininga IH; Zijlstra WP; Boomsma MF; Bulstra SK; van Raay JJ
    Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1481-7. PubMed ID: 26530649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early failure of articular surface replacement XL total hip arthroplasty.
    Steele GD; Fehring TK; Odum SM; Dennos AC; Nadaud MC
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6 Suppl):14-8. PubMed ID: 21550764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient-Reported Outcomes After Revision of Metal-on-Metal Total Bearings in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Mata-Fink A; Philipson DJ; Keeney BJ; Ramkumar DB; Moschetti WE; Tomek IM
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Apr; 32(4):1241-1244. PubMed ID: 27817993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.