These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2242537)

  • 21. Optimized first phase tilt in "parallel-series" biphasic waveform.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey KA; Kroll MW; Brewer JE; Donohoo AM; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Jun; 8(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 9209966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ascending-ramp biphasic waveform has a lower defibrillation threshold and releases less troponin I than a truncated exponential biphasic waveform.
    Huang J; Walcott GP; Ruse RB; Bohanan SJ; Killingsworth CR; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2012 Sep; 126(11):1328-33. PubMed ID: 22865891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic truncated exponential shocks for nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs.
    Chapman PD; Vetter JW; Souza JJ; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN; Hoffmann RG
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 12(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 3403834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved safety factor for triphasic defibrillator waveforms.
    Jones JL; Jones RE
    Circ Res; 1989 Jun; 64(6):1172-7. PubMed ID: 2720918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Defibrillation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage.
    Tomassoni G; Newby K; Deshpande S; Axtell K; Sra J; Akhtar M; Natale A
    Circulation; 1997 Apr; 95(7):1822-6. PubMed ID: 9107169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation: impact of new experimental defibrillator waveforms.
    Blanchard SM; Ideker RE
    Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):970-7. PubMed ID: 8160601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.
    Kroll MW; Swerdlow CD
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2007 Apr; 18(3):247-63. PubMed ID: 17541815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of second and third phase duration on defibrillation efficacy of triphasic rectangle waveforms.
    Tang C; Wang P; Gong Y; Wei L; Li Y; Zhang S
    Resuscitation; 2016 May; 102():57-62. PubMed ID: 26939971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of shock waveform on relationship between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold.
    Swerdlow CD; Kass RM; O'Connor ME; Chen PS
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1998 Apr; 9(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 9581950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of phase duration on defibrillation success of dual time constant biphasic waveforms.
    Shan Y; Ristagno G; Fuller M; Sun S; Li Y; Weil MH; Russell J; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2010 Feb; 81(2):236-41. PubMed ID: 19945206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fully discharging phases. A new approach to biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation.
    Yamanouchi Y; Brewer JE; Olson KF; Mowrey KA; Mazgalev TN; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Circulation; 1999 Aug; 100(8):826-31. PubMed ID: 10458718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveform.
    Fain ES; Sweeney MB; Franz MR
    Am Heart J; 1989 Feb; 117(2):358-64. PubMed ID: 2916410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans.
    Bardy GH; Ivey TD; Allen MD; Johnson G; Mehra R; Greene HL
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Sep; 14(3):728-33. PubMed ID: 2768721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conditioning prepulse of biphasic defibrillator waveforms enhances refractoriness to fibrillation wavefronts.
    Swartz JF; Jones JL; Jones RE; Fletcher R
    Circ Res; 1991 Feb; 68(2):438-49. PubMed ID: 1991348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE; Alferness CA; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 1992 Jun; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The strength-duration relationship of monophasic waveforms with varying capacitance sizes in external defibrillation.
    Yamanouchi Y; Mowrey K; Mazgalev TN; Wilkoff BL; Tchou PJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Dec; 26(12):2213-8. PubMed ID: 14675002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ventricular defibrillation with triphasic waveforms.
    Huang J; KenKnight BH; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1324-8. PubMed ID: 10725294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting the relative efficacy of shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in dogs.
    White JB; Walcott GP; Wayland JL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 34(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 10459086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Waveform optimization for internal atrial defibrillation: effects of waveform rounding, phase duration, and voltage swing.
    Kidwai BJ; Allen JD; Harbinson MT; McIntyre A; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1198-207. PubMed ID: 11523604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the efficacy of defibrillation with the damped sine and constant-tilt current waveforms in the intact animal.
    Hinds M; Ayers GM; Bourland JD; Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Fearnot N
    Med Instrum; 1987 Apr; 21(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 3614037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.