These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22425427)

  • 1. Technical refinement and learning curve for attenuating neurapraxia during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve sexual function.
    Alemozaffar M; Duclos A; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Borza T; Yu HY; Kowalczyk KJ; Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2012 Jun; 61(6):1222-8. PubMed ID: 22425427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?
    Ko YH; Coelho RF; Sivaraman A; Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Carrion RJ; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23092543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
    Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.
    Basal S; Wambi C; Acikel C; Gupta M; Badani K
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 23186312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Sivaraman A; Kameh D; Palmer KJ; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):796-802. PubMed ID: 22230713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of sexual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Carter S; Le JD; Hu JC
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jan; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 23169152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
    Trinh QD; Sammon J; Sun M; Ravi P; Ghani KR; Bianchi M; Jeong W; Shariat SF; Hansen J; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Rogers CG; Peabody JO; Montorsi F; Menon M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.
    Galfano A; Di Trapani D; Sozzi F; Strada E; Petralia G; Bramerio M; Ascione A; Gambacorta M; Bocciardi AM
    Eur Urol; 2013 Dec; 64(6):974-80. PubMed ID: 23856036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nerve-sparing approach during radical prostatectomy is strongly associated with the rate of postoperative urinary continence recovery.
    Suardi N; Moschini M; Gallina A; Gandaglia G; Abdollah F; Capitanio U; Bianchi M; Tutolo M; Passoni N; Salonia A; Hedlund P; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 22726993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association of surgeon subjective characterization of nerve sparing quality with potency following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Levinson AW; Pavlovich CP; Ward NT; Link RE; Mettee LZ; Su LM
    J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1510-4. PubMed ID: 18295270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of multiple biopsies on outcomes of nerve-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Sooriakumaran P; Calaway A; Sagalovich D; Roy S; Srivastava A; Joneja J; Shevchuk M; Tewari AK
    Int J Impot Res; 2012; 24(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 22534563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes.
    Willis DL; Gonzalgo ML; Brotzman M; Feng Z; Trock B; Su LM
    BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 21933328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
    Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN
    Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.