These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Porpiglia F; Morra I; Lucci Chiarissi M; Manfredi M; Mele F; Grande S; Ragni F; Poggio M; Fiori C Eur Urol; 2013 Apr; 63(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 22840353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Ko WJ; Truesdale MD; Hruby GW; Landman J; Badani KK J Sex Med; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21426493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control. Hu JC; Gandaglia G; Karakiewicz PI; Nguyen PL; Trinh QD; Shih YC; Abdollah F; Chamie K; Wright JL; Ganz PA; Sun M Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 24602934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Health-related quality-of-life outcomes after anatomic retropubic radical prostatectomy in the phosphodiesterase type 5 ERA: impact of neurovascular bundle preservation. Haffner MC; Landis PK; Saigal CS; Carter HB; Freedland SJ Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):371-6. PubMed ID: 16040103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Briganti A; Fabbri F; Salonia A; Gallina A; Chun FK; Dehò F; Zanni G; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 17418936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Advances in imaging the neurovascular bundle. Rai S; Srivastava A; Sooriakumaran P; Tewari A Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Mar; 22(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 22273757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high-volume surgeon. Patel VR; Coelho RF; Chauhan S; Orvieto MA; Palmer KJ; Rocco B; Sivaraman A; Coughlin G BJU Int; 2010 Sep; 106(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 20707793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Is laparoscopic unilateral sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy effective in retaining sexual potency? Porpiglia F; Ragni F; Terrone C; Renard J; Musso F; Grande S; Cracco C; Ghignone G; Scarpa RM BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1267-71. PubMed ID: 15892814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy. Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy? Cimen HI; Atik YT; Altinova S; Adsan O; Balbay MD Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 30521164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ficarra V; Novara G; Ahlering TE; Costello A; Eastham JA; Graefen M; Guazzoni G; Menon M; Mottrie A; Patel VR; Van der Poel H; Rosen RC; Tewari AK; Wilson TG; Zattoni F; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2012 Sep; 62(3):418-30. PubMed ID: 22749850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Chien GW; Mikhail AA; Orvieto MA; Zagaja GP; Sokoloff MH; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL Urology; 2005 Aug; 66(2):419-23. PubMed ID: 16040100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comprehensive prediction model of urinary incontinence one year following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Barnoiu OS; Baron Lopez F; Garcia Galisteo E; Soler Martinez J; Vozmediano Chicharro R; Del Rosal Samaniego JM; Machuca Santacruz J; Navarro Vilchez P; Sanchez Luque J; Bautista Vidal C; Gomez Lechuga P; Baena Gonzalez V Urol Int; 2013; 90(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 23207744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Role of extent of fascia preservation and erectile function after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. van der Poel HG; de Blok W Urology; 2009 Apr; 73(4):816-21. PubMed ID: 19195692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Ficarra V; Borghesi M; Suardi N; De Naeyer G; Novara G; Schatteman P; De Groote R; Carpentier P; Mottrie A BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 23470027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy using high anterior release of the levator fascia and constant haptic feedback in bilateral neurovascular bundle preservation plus early postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition: a contemporary series. Hubanks JM; Umbreit EC; Karnes RJ; Myers RP Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):878-84. PubMed ID: 22154730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]