785 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22426247)
1. A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.
Xie F; Ji Y; Tremmel L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):739-48. PubMed ID: 22426247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose-finding design driven by efficacy in onco-hematology phase I/II trials.
Seegers V; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M
Stat Med; 2011 Jun; 30(13):1574-83. PubMed ID: 21394754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: illustrations and practical considerations.
Thall PF; Cook JD; Estey EH
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):623-38. PubMed ID: 17037262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A phase I/II seamless dose escalation/expansion with adaptive randomization scheme (SEARS).
Pan H; Xie F; Liu P; Xia J; Ji Y
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 24137041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A bayesian dose-finding design adapting to efficacy and tolerability response.
Padmanabhan SK; Berry S; Dragalin V; Krams M
J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):276-93. PubMed ID: 22251174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Bayesian adaptive dose selection procedure with an overdispersed count endpoint.
Pozzi L; Schmidli H; Gasparini M; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):5008-27. PubMed ID: 24022748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.
Gerke O; Siedentop H
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5329-44. PubMed ID: 17849502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using the partitioning principle to adaptively design dose-response studies.
Ling X; Hsu J
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):733-43. PubMed ID: 17037268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An adaptive dose-finding approach for correlated bivariate binary and continuous outcomes in phase I oncology trials.
Hirakawa A
Stat Med; 2012 Mar; 31(6):516-32. PubMed ID: 22108785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A parallel phase I/II clinical trial design for combination therapies.
Huang X; Biswas S; Oki Y; Issa JP; Berry DA
Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 17688495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. np1: a computer program for dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials.
Kramar A; Houédé N; Paoletti X
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2007 Oct; 88(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 17719124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals.
Ji Y; Li Y; Nebiyou Bekele B
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 17715248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.
Bekele BN; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 16011680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios.
Yin G; Li Y; Ji Y
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 16984320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuous toxicity monitoring in phase II trials in oncology.
Ivanova A; Qaqish BF; Schell MJ
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):540-5. PubMed ID: 16011702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of the continual reassessment method to a phase I dose-finding trial in Japanese patients: East meets West.
Morita S
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2090-7. PubMed ID: 21500239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.
Thall PF; Russell KE
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):251-64. PubMed ID: 9544520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An adaptive design to bridge the gap between Phase 2b/3 microbicide effectiveness trials and evidence required for licensure.
Taylor DJ; Grobler A; Abdool Karim SS
Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 22610168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneously optimizing dose and schedule of a new cytotoxic agent.
Braun TM; Thall PF; Nguyen H; de Lima M
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 17456511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian dose finding design for dual endpoint phase I trials.
Loke YC; Tan SB; Cai Y; Machin D
Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16013039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
