785 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22426247)
21. Seamless Phase II/III combination study through response adaptive randomization.
Wang L; Cui L
J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1177-87. PubMed ID: 18027224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Bayesian evaluation of enrolling additional patients at the maximum tolerated dose in Phase I trials.
Gönen M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 15837436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A hybrid Bayesian adaptive design for dose response trials.
Chang M; Chow SC
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):677-91. PubMed ID: 16022172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Adaptive Bayesian design for phase I dose-finding trials using a joint model of response and toxicity.
Wang M; Day R
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jan; 20(1):125-44. PubMed ID: 20077253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Planning a Bayesian early-phase phase I/II study for human vaccines in HER2 carcinomas.
Zohar S; Baldi I; Forni G; Merletti F; Masucci G; Gregori D
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 20922817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A group sequential adaptive treatment assignment design for proof of concept and dose selection in headache trials.
Hall DB; Meier U; Diener HC
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Jun; 26(3):349-64. PubMed ID: 15911469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of Bayesian hierarchical models for phase I/II clinical trials in oncology.
Yada S; Hamada C
Pharm Stat; 2017 Mar; 16(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 27892650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
Zhang W; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar S
Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2365-83. PubMed ID: 16220478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phase I (or phase II) dose-ranging clinical trials: proposal of a two-stage Bayesian design.
Zohar S; Chevret S
J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Feb; 13(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 12635905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of model choices for the Continual Reassessment Method in phase I cancer trials.
Paoletti X; Kramar A
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):3012-28. PubMed ID: 19672839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sequential or combined designs for Phase I/II clinical trials? A simulation study.
Rossoni C; Bardet A; Geoerger B; Paoletti X
Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):635-644. PubMed ID: 31538815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.
Koopmeiners JS; Modiano J
Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24082004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
Polley MY; Cheung YK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A Bayesian design and analysis for dose-response using informative prior information.
Smith MK; Marshall S
J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(5):695-709. PubMed ID: 17037266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Regulatory perspectives on multiplicity in adaptive design clinical trials throughout a drug development program.
Wang SJ; Hung HM; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jul; 21(4):846-59. PubMed ID: 21516573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
Lin R; Yin G
Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dose-finding designs in pediatric phase I clinical trials: comparison by simulations in a realistic timeline framework.
Doussau A; Asselain B; Le Deley MC; Geoerger B; Doz F; Vassal G; Paoletti X
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jul; 33(4):657-65. PubMed ID: 22521954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Applications of Bayesian statistical methodology to clinical trial design: A case study of a phase 2 trial with an interim futility assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Smith CL; Jin Y; Raddad E; McNearney TA; Ni X; Monteith D; Brown R; Deeg MA; Schnitzer T
Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 30321909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
