These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22427146)

  • 1. Ozil IP torsional mode versus combined torsional/longitudinal microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Helvacioglu F; Tunc Z; Yeter C; Oguzhan H; Sencan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2012; 22(6):936-42. PubMed ID: 22427146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification performed by 12-degree and 22-degree bent tips.
    Helvacioglu F; Yeter C; Tunc Z; Sencan S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 39(8):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23707410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification using tips with 30-degree and 45-degree aperture angles.
    Helvacioglu F; Sencan S; Yeter C; Tunc Z; Uyar OM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 24440105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two different ultrasound methods of phacoemulsification.
    Helvacioglu F; Yeter C; Sencan S; Tunc Z; Uyar OM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 158(2):221-226.e1. PubMed ID: 24792106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.
    Liu Y; Zeng M; Liu X; Luo L; Yuan Z; Xia Y; Zeng Y
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Feb; 33(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 17276271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of torsional and longitudinal modes using phacoemulsification parameters.
    Rekas M; Montés-Micó R; Krix-Jachym K; Kluś A; Stankiewicz A; Ferrer-Blasco T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1719-24. PubMed ID: 19781466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Computer-assisted phacoemulsification for hard cataracts].
    Zemba M; Papadatu AC; Sîrbu LN; Avram C
    Oftalmologia; 2012; 56(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 23755523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal endothelial morphology and function after torsional and longitudinal ultrasound mode phacoemulsification.
    Módis LJ; Szalai E; Flaskó Z; Németh G
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2016; 60(2):109-115. PubMed ID: 29450332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of Balanced Torsional Phacoemulsification Tip for Cataract Surgery.
    Sabur H; Eroglu SA; Azarsiz SS
    J Curr Ophthalmol; 2022; 34(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 35620374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ozil® versus conventional ultrasound phacoemulsification: a randomized comparative study.
    Maalej A; Khallouli A; Wathek C; Rannen R
    Int Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 35(4):565-8. PubMed ID: 25155201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of 45-degree Kelman and 45-degree balanced phaco tip designs in torsional microcoaxial phacoemulsification.
    Demircan S; Ataş M; Göktaş E; Başkan B
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(6):1168-72. PubMed ID: 26682167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparison between torsional and conventional mode phacoemulsification in moderate and hard cataracts.
    Kim DH; Wee WR; Lee JH; Kim MK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):336-40. PubMed ID: 21165231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Torsional ultrasound mode versus combined torsional and conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification for eyes with hard cataract.
    Fakhry MA; El Shazly MI
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2011; 5():973-8. PubMed ID: 21792288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Endothelial cell loss: Biaxial small-incision torsional phacoemulsification versus biaxial small-incision longitudinal phacoemulsification.
    Gonen T; Sever O; Horozoglu F; Yasar M; Keskinbora KH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1918-24. PubMed ID: 22980723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of the New Torsional Phacoemulsification Software Phacoemulsification (Ozil IP) in Hard Cataracts.
    Kotb AM; Elawamry AI
    Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2013; 2(6):372-4. PubMed ID: 26107149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative studies between longitudinal and torsional modes in phacoemulsification, using active fluidics technology along with the intrepid balanced tip.
    Dasgupta S; Mehra R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 66(10):1417-1422. PubMed ID: 30249825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcome comparison of longitudinal, torsional, and transversal phacoemulsification machines.
    Christakis PG; Braga-Mele RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 38(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 22153315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system.
    Lee KM; Kwon HG; Joo CK
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 May; 35(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 19393887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mini-flared Kelman tip, reverse tip, and sidewinder tip with torsional phaco: a prospective randomized comparative study.
    Hida WT; Tzelikis PF; Nakano CT; Motta AF; Alves MR
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2015; 78(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 25714532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of balanced phacoemulsification tip on the outcomes of torsional phacoemulsification using an active-fluidics system.
    Khokhar S; Aron N; Sen S; Pillay G; Agarwal E
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jan; 43(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 28317673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.