These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22427266)

  • 1. Reasoning with base rates is routine, relatively effortless, and context dependent.
    Pennycook G; Thompson VA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Jun; 19(3):528-34. PubMed ID: 22427266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The base rate neglect in episodic memory.
    Lu Y; Nieznański M
    Memory; 2020 Feb; 28(2):270-277. PubMed ID: 31910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample representativeness affects whether judgments are influenced by base rate or sample size.
    Obrecht NA; Chesney DL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Mar; 142(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 23422291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Not that neglected! Base rates influence related and unrelated judgments.
    Białek M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():10-16. PubMed ID: 28431299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.
    Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Base rates: both neglected and intuitive.
    Pennycook G; Trippas D; Handley SJ; Thompson VA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):544-54. PubMed ID: 24219086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of causal models in multiple judgments under uncertainty.
    Hayes BK; Hawkins GE; Newell BR; Pasqualino M; Rehder B
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):611-20. PubMed ID: 25238316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of disablers on predictive inference.
    Cummins DD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1638-55. PubMed ID: 24911137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief.
    Gavanski I; Hui C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1992 Nov; 63(5):766-80. PubMed ID: 1447692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Beliefs and Bayesian reasoning.
    Cohen AL; Sidlowski S; Staub A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):972-978. PubMed ID: 27604495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic causal reasoning with verbal information.
    Meder B; Mayrhofer R
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Aug; 96():54-84. PubMed ID: 28623726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: beyond base rate neglect and statistical format.
    Fiedler K; Brinkmann B; Betsch T; Wild B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Sep; 129(3):399-418. PubMed ID: 11006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interference of introversion-extraversion and depressive symptomatology with reasoning performance: a behavioural study.
    Papageorgiou C; Rabavilas AD; Stachtea X; Giannakakis GA; Kyprianou M; Papadimitriou GN; Stefanis CN
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2012 Apr; 41(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 22038390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the generality and cognitive basis of base-rate neglect.
    Stengård E; Juslin P; Hahn U; van den Berg R
    Cognition; 2022 Sep; 226():105160. PubMed ID: 35660344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning?
    McNair S; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):625-45. PubMed ID: 23931633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The effects of judge's roles on probability judgment].
    Minami M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1997 Jun; 68(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 9278959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do smart people have better intuitions?
    Thompson VA; Pennycook G; Trippas D; Evans JSBT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Jul; 147(7):945-961. PubMed ID: 29975089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting Outcomes in a Sequence of Binary Events: Belief Updating and Gambler's Fallacy Reasoning.
    Rao K; Hastie R
    Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 47(1):e13211. PubMed ID: 36680427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The development of the representativeness heuristic in young children.
    Gualtieri S; Denison S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Oct; 174():60-76. PubMed ID: 29913307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.