These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22428425)

  • 1. When violations of perfect duties do not cause strong trait attributions.
    Trafimow D; Ishikawa Y
    Am J Psychol; 2012; 125(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 22428425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intentionality attributions about perfect and imperfect duty violations.
    Hughes JS; Trafimow D
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 20397594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generalizing Kant's distinction between perfect and imperfect duties to trust in different situations.
    Rice S; Trafimow D; Hunt G; Sandry J
    J Gen Psychol; 2010; 137(1):20-36. PubMed ID: 20198814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who attributes what to whom? Moral values and relational context shape causal attribution to the person or the situation.
    Niemi L; Doris JM; Graham J
    Cognition; 2023 Mar; 232():105332. PubMed ID: 36508991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The generality of negative hierarchically restrictive behaviours.
    Brown J; Trafimow D; Gregory WL
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2005 Mar; 44(Pt 1):3-13. PubMed ID: 15901388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can priming your self lead to punishing others?
    Sandry J; Hunt G; Rice S; Trafimow D; Geels K
    J Soc Psychol; 2011; 151(5):531-4. PubMed ID: 22017071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using potential performance theory to test five hypotheses about meta-attribution.
    Trafimow D; Hunt G; Rice S; Geels K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):81-93. PubMed ID: 21560466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of moral responsibility and wrongness for intentional and accidental harm and purity violations.
    Parkinson M; Byrne RMJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Mar; 71(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 28059634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harmful situations, impure people: an attribution asymmetry across moral domains.
    Chakroff A; Young L
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():30-7. PubMed ID: 25490126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Young children's behavioral and emotional responses to different social norm violations.
    Hardecker S; Schmidt MFH; Roden M; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Oct; 150():364-379. PubMed ID: 27429365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In a moral dilemma, choose the one you love: Impartial actors are seen as less moral than partial ones.
    Hughes JS
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 56(3):561-577. PubMed ID: 28474440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Immoral Assumption Effect: Moralization Drives Negative Trait Attributions.
    Meindl P; Johnson KM; Graham J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Apr; 42(4):540-53. PubMed ID: 26984017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benign violations: making immoral behavior funny.
    McGraw AP; Warren C
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1141-9. PubMed ID: 20587696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mind attributions about moral actors: intentionality is greater given coherent cues.
    Hughes JS; Trafimow D
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Jun; 54(2):220-35. PubMed ID: 24965741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social justifications for moral emotions: when reasons for disgust are less elaborated than for anger.
    Russell PS; Giner-Sorolla R
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):637-46. PubMed ID: 21534665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wrongness in different relationships: Relational context effects on moral judgment.
    Simpson A; Laham SM; Fiske AP
    J Soc Psychol; 2016; 156(6):594-609. PubMed ID: 26751010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of hunger and satiety in the judgment of ethical violations.
    Vicario CM; Kuran KA; Rogers R; Rafal RD
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():32-36. PubMed ID: 29852339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CAD or MAD? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code.
    Royzman E; Atanasov P; Landy JF; Parks A; Gepty A
    Emotion; 2014 Oct; 14(5):892-907. PubMed ID: 24866519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bad is freer than good: Positive-negative asymmetry in attributions of free will.
    Feldman G; Wong KFE; Baumeister RF
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():26-40. PubMed ID: 26985880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The lives of others: Third parties' responses to others' injustice.
    O'Reilly J; Aquino K; Skarlicki D
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Feb; 101(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 26214088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.