These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22429189)

  • 1. Agreement between psychophysical tuning curves and the threshold equalizing noise test in dead region identification.
    Warnaar B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jun; 51(6):456-64. PubMed ID: 22429189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosing cochlear dead regions in children.
    Malicka AN; Munro KJ; Baker RJ
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 19935424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):115-31. PubMed ID: 15668043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporary off-frequency listening after noise trauma.
    Etchelecou MC; Coulet O; Derkenne R; Tomasi M; Noreña AJ
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):81-91. PubMed ID: 21986211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Psychoacoustic analyses of cochlear mechanisms in tinnitus patients with normal auditory thresholds.
    Buzo BC; Carvallo RM
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 24168288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulating psychophysical tuning curves in listeners with dead regions.
    Warnaar B; Jepsen ML; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):533-44. PubMed ID: 23786395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Moore BC; Huss M; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Alcántara JI
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Aug; 34(4):205-24. PubMed ID: 10997450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions.
    Cairns S; Frith R; Munro KJ; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Oct; 46(10):575-84. PubMed ID: 17922347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Severe difficulties with word recognition in noise after platinum chemotherapy in childhood, and improvements with open-fitting hearing-aids.
    Einarsson EJ; Petersen H; Wiebe T; Fransson PA; Magnusson M; Moëll C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Oct; 50(10):642-51. PubMed ID: 21812630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an aided TEN test for diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.
    Marriage J; Moore BC; Ogg V; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 18344872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
    van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
    Boothalingam S; Lineton B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones.
    Mens LH
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves.
    Sęk A; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Apr; 50(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 21299376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency discrimination in ears with and without contralateral cochlear dead regions.
    Heggdal PO; Lind O; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):553-7. PubMed ID: 23786393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ).
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller KM; Watts KL; La More C
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 21470067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
    Vinay ; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):542-53. PubMed ID: 17622189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.