These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22429369)
1. Detection of breast lesions using an automated breast volume scanner system. Zhang Q; Hu B; Hu B; Li WB J Int Med Res; 2012; 40(1):300-6. PubMed ID: 22429369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The efficacy of automated breast volume scanning over conventional ultrasonography among patients with breast lesions. Xiao YM; Chen ZH; Zhou QC; Wang Z Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Dec; 131(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 26493011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal scanning technique to cover the whole breast using an automated breast volume scanner. Tozaki M; Isobe S; Yamaguchi M; Ogawa Y; Kohara M; Joo C; Fukuma E Jpn J Radiol; 2010 May; 28(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 20512554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) Compared to Handheld Ultrasonography With Breast MRI as the Gold Standard. Schmachtenberg C; Fischer T; Hamm B; Bick U Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-961. PubMed ID: 28336007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results. Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound. Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations. Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined use of the automated breast volume scanner and the US elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast. Xu C; Wei S; Xie Y; Guan X; Fu N; Huang P; Yang B BMC Cancer; 2014 Nov; 14():798. PubMed ID: 25366878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detectability of breast lesions under the nipple using an automated breast volume scanner: comparison with handheld ultrasonography. Isobe S; Tozaki M; Yamaguchi M; Ogawa Y; Homma K; Satomi R; Saito M; Joo C; Fukuma E Jpn J Radiol; 2011 Jun; 29(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 21717306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of automated versus hand-held breast US in supplemental screening in asymptomatic women with dense breasts: is there a difference regarding woman preference, lesion detection and lesion characterization? Tutar B; Esen Icten G; Guldogan N; Kara H; Arıkan AE; Tutar O; Uras C Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 May; 301(5):1257-1265. PubMed ID: 32215718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated breast volume scanning versus conventional ultrasound in breast cancer screening. Xiao Y; Zhou Q; Chen Z Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 25620036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of automated breast volume scanning and hand- held ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer: an analysis of 5,566 patient evaluations. Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Kim H; Chae EY; Hong MJ Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(21):9101-5. PubMed ID: 25422185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer concordance in lesion detection with the automated breast volume scanner (ABVS). Wojcinski S; Gyapong S; Farrokh A; Soergel P; Hillemanns P; Degenhardt F BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Nov; 13():36. PubMed ID: 24219312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of combined use of automated breast volume scanning & hand-held ultrasound for breast lesions. Liu J; Zhou Y; Wu J; Li P; Liang X; Duan H; Wu X; Hou X; Li X Indian J Med Res; 2021 Aug; 154(2):347-354. PubMed ID: 35295015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound. Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic value of automated breast volume scanner in high-risk and small breast lesions]. Su KL; Xu HB; Zhang ZX; Pan N; He JL; Hu ZJ; Yang OO; Luo H; Yang HF; Liu LL Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 35(9):703-7. PubMed ID: 24332060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging. Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening. Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective Study Comparing Two Second-Look Ultrasound Techniques: Handheld Ultrasound and an Automated Breast Volume Scanner. Kim Y; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee EJ J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2103-12. PubMed ID: 27503758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]