These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22429927)

  • 21. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries.
    Anbiaee N; Mohassel AR; Imanimoghaddam M; Moazzami SM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Dec; 11(6):E025-32. PubMed ID: 21203734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of Different Contact Materials on Approximal Caries Detection by Laser Fluorescence and Light-Emitting Diode Devices.
    Ozsevik AS; Kararslan ES; Aktan AM; Bozdemir E; Cebe F; Sarı F
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Oct; 33(10):492-7. PubMed ID: 26352346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars.
    Huth KC; Neuhaus KW; Gygax M; Bücher K; Crispin A; Paschos E; Hickel R; Lussi A
    J Dent; 2008 Dec; 36(12):1033-40. PubMed ID: 18930575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars - an in vitro study.
    Novaes TF; Matos R; Gimenez T; Braga MM; DE Benedetto MS; Mendes FM
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Nov; 22(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 22276618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
    Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
    Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between gap width and recurrent dental caries beneath occlusal margins of amalgam restorations.
    Hodges DJ; Mangum FI; Ward MT
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1995 Aug; 23(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 7587139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods.
    Novaes TF; Matos R; Raggio DP; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM
    Caries Res; 2010; 44(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 20861630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
    Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.
    Duggal MS; Toumba KJ; Sharma NK
    Br Dent J; 2002 Sep; 193(6):339-42. PubMed ID: 12368893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Int Dent J; 1991 Dec; 41(6):359-64. PubMed ID: 1800386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validity and reliability of methods for the detection of secondary caries around amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Braga MM; Chiarotti AP; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 20339722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of several techniques for the detection of secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations.
    Ando M; González-Cabezas C; Isaacs RL; Eckert GJ; Stookey GK
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 15181334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
    Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differences between reported and actual restored caries lesion depths: results from The Dental PBRN.
    Rindal DB; Gordan VV; Fellows JL; Spurlock NL; Bauer MR; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH
    Tex Dent J; 2014 Jul; 131(7):520-8. PubMed ID: 25265686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validity of staining and marginal ditching as criteria for diagnosis of secondary caries around occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study.
    Magalhães CS; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Ferreira EF
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20069254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Secondary caries related to various marginal gaps around amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Dérand T; Birkhed D; Edwardsson S
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 1876980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries.
    Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E
    Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In Vivo and In Vitro performance of Conventional Methods, DIAGNOdent, and an Electronic Caries Monitor for Occlusal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Sener Y; Botsali MS
    Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(4):E14-22. PubMed ID: 26314593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Secondary caries around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Navarro MF; Consolaro A
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Sep; 74(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 7473273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.