64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2243009)
1. Short-term fluctuation as an estimate of variability in visual field data.
Casson EJ; Shapiro LR; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 31(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 2243009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss.
McKendrick AM; Turpin A
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15630403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Wild JM; Kim LS; Pacey IE; Cunliffe IA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry.
Johnson CA; Chauhan BC; Shapiro LR
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Sep; 33(10):2966-74. PubMed ID: 1526745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Statistical modelling of the central 10-degree visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
Cubbidge RP; Hosking SL; Embleton S
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):650-7. PubMed ID: 12192459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical alternative for reducing the time needed to perform automated threshold perimetry.
Fingeret M
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):699-705. PubMed ID: 8576535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulation of longitudinal threshold visual field data.
Spry PG; Bates AB; Johnson CA; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jul; 41(8):2192-200. PubMed ID: 10892862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.
Miranda MA; Henson DB
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18005269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results.
Kudrna GR; Stanley MA; Remington LA
J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 8576532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
Wall M; Woodward KR; Doyle CK; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fluctuations on the Humphrey and Octopus perimeters.
Brenton RS; Argus WA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1987 May; 28(5):767-71. PubMed ID: 3570687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of intraocular pressure reduction on perimetric variability in glaucomatous eyes.
Fogagnolo P; McNaught A; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Orzalesi N
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4557-63. PubMed ID: 17898278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retesting visual fields: utilizing prior information to decrease test-retest variability in glaucoma.
Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick AM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Apr; 48(4):1627-34. PubMed ID: 17389493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Variability of sensitivity thresholds in short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in the central vision field].
Polo Llorens V; Larrosa Poves JM; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez L; Rojo Aragües A; Cuevas Andrés R; Ruiz Moreno O; Honrubia López FM
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 11151125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glaucomatous visual field progression with frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in a longitudinal prospective study.
Haymes SA; Hutchison DM; McCormick TA; Varma DK; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Feb; 46(2):547-54. PubMed ID: 15671281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
Bengtsson B; Hellgren KJ; Agardh E
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
