147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22430309)
1. Restoring river connectivity: prioritizing passage improvements for diadromous fishes and lampreys.
Nunn AD; Cowx IG
Ambio; 2012 Jun; 41(4):402-9. PubMed ID: 22430309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding the impact of barriers to onward migration; a novel approach using translocated fish.
Jubb WM; Noble RAA; Dodd JR; Nunn AD; Lothian AJ; Albright AJ; Bubb DH; Lucas MC; Bolland JD
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jun; 335():117488. PubMed ID: 36827802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing upstream fish passage connectivity with network analysis.
McKay SK; Schramski JR; Conyngham JN; Fischenich JC
Ecol Appl; 2013 Sep; 23(6):1396-409. PubMed ID: 24147411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Supporting decision-making for improving longitudinal connectivity for diadromous and potamodromous fishes in complex catchments.
Brevé NWP; Buijse AD; Kroes MJ; Wanningen H; Vriese FT
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 496():206-218. PubMed ID: 25084228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emigration of post-spawned twaite shad Alosa fallax, an anadromous and iteroparous fish, in a highly fragmented river.
Yeldham MIA; Britton JR; Crundwell C; Davies P; Dodd JR; Nunn AD; Velterop R; Bolland JD
J Fish Biol; 2024 Jun; 104(6):1860-1874. PubMed ID: 38494640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Restoring stream habitat connectivity: a proposed method for prioritizing the removal of resident fish passage barriers.
O'Hanley JR; Wright J; Diebel M; Fedora MA; Soucy CL
J Environ Manage; 2013 Aug; 125():19-27. PubMed ID: 23632001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the effectiveness of restoring longitudinal connectivity for stream fish communities: towards a more holistic approach.
Tummers JS; Hudson S; Lucas MC
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Nov; 569-570():850-860. PubMed ID: 27423105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integration of juvenile habitat quality and river connectivity models to understand and prioritise the management of barriers for Atlantic salmon populations across spatial scales.
Buddendorf WB; Jackson FL; Malcolm IA; Millidine KJ; Geris J; Wilkinson ME; Soulsby C
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 655():557-566. PubMed ID: 30476835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling diadromous fish loss from historical data: Identification of anthropogenic drivers and testing of mitigation scenarios.
Merg ML; Dézerald O; Kreutzenberger K; Demski S; Reyjol Y; Usseglio-Polatera P; Belliard J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0236575. PubMed ID: 32722713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective fish passage: Restoring habitat connectivity without facilitating the spread of a non-native species.
Kerr JR; Vowles AS; Crabb MC; Kemp PS
J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 279():110908. PubMed ID: 33199135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coupling systematic planning and expert judgement enhances the efficiency of river restoration.
Langhans SD; Gessner J; Hermoso V; Wolter C
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():266-73. PubMed ID: 27101463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved river continuity facilitates fishes' abilities to track future environmental changes.
Radinger J; Hölker F; Horký P; Slavík O; Wolter C
J Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 208():169-179. PubMed ID: 29268184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fish-passage facilities as ecological traps in large neotropical rivers.
Pelicice FM; Agostinho AA
Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 18254863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are we designing fishways for diversity? Potential selection on alternative phenotypes resulting from differential passage in brown trout.
Lothian AJ; Schwinn M; Anton AH; Adams CE; Newton M; Koed A; Lucas MC
J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 262():110317. PubMed ID: 32250800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. River Continuity Restoration and Diadromous Fishes: Much More than an Ecological Issue.
Drouineau H; Carter C; Rambonilaza M; Beaufaron G; Bouleau G; Gassiat A; Lambert P; le Floch S; Tétard S; de Oliveira E
Environ Manage; 2018 Apr; 61(4):671-686. PubMed ID: 29330607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selective fragmentation and the management of fish movement across anthropogenic barriers.
Rahel FJ; McLaughlin RL
Ecol Appl; 2018 Dec; 28(8):2066-2081. PubMed ID: 30168645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-efficiency aspects for fish passage restoration in the Ruhr River Basin.
Weyand M; Redeker M; Nusch EA
Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(10):293-300. PubMed ID: 16838715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prioritizing native migratory fish passage restoration while limiting the spread of invasive species: A case study in the Upper Mississippi River.
Cooper AR; Infante DM; O'Hanley JR; Yu H; Neeson TM; Brumm KJ
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 791():148317. PubMed ID: 34412399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Potential interactions between diadromous fishes of U.K. conservation importance and the electromagnetic fields and subsea noise from marine renewable energy developments.
Gill AB; Bartlett M; Thomsen F
J Fish Biol; 2012 Jul; 81(2):664-95. PubMed ID: 22803729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diversity in migratory patterns among Neotropical fishes in a highly regulated river basin.
Makrakis MC; Miranda LE; Makrakis S; Fontes Júnior HM; Morlis WG; Dias JH; Garcia JO
J Fish Biol; 2012 Jul; 81(2):866-81. PubMed ID: 22803739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
