252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22430701)
1. Effect of different impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
Singh K; Sahoo S; Prasad KD; Goel M; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 22430701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
Caputi S; Varvara G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques.
Mishra S; Chowdhary R
J Investig Clin Dent; 2010 Aug; 1(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 25427185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of tray space and repeat pours on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impression.
Rajapur A; Dixit S; Hoshing C; Raikar SP
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):824-9. PubMed ID: 23404010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of tray space on the accuracy of monophasic polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Tjan AH; Nemetz H; Nguyen LT; Contino R
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Jul; 68(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 1403906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of various putty-wash impression techniques on marginal fit of cast crowns.
Nissan J; Rosner O; Bukhari MA; Ghelfan O; Pilo R
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(1):e37-42. PubMed ID: 23342356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determining the accuracy of stock and custom tray impression/casts.
Millstein P; Maya A; Segura C
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Aug; 25(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 9781870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2-phase, and 3-phase impression techniques: an in vitro study.
Varvara G; Murmura G; Sinjari B; Cardelli P; Caputi S
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 25438741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of impression tray design and impression technique upon the accuracy of stone casts produced from a putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Taylor WG
J Dent; 1991 Oct; 19(5):283-9. PubMed ID: 1806594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
Tjan AH; Li T
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions made with standard and reinforced stock trays.
Wassell RW; Ibbetson RJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 2072315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Stone Models Fabricated by Three Different Impression Techniques Using Two Brands of Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Materials.
Garg S; Kumar S; Jain S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Aug; 20(8):928-934. PubMed ID: 31797849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
Teraoka F; Takahashi J
Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of impression materials and techniques on the marginal fit of metal castings.
Gelbard S; Aoskar Y; Zalkind M; Stern N
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan; 71(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8120837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
