252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22430701)
21. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques.
Al Quran FA; Rashdan BA; Zomar AA; Weiner S
Quintessence Int; 2012 Feb; 43(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 22257873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictable definitive impressions for multiple indirect restorations using a modified putty and wash impression procedure.
Leong EW; Cheng AC; Khin NT; Lee H; Leong DJ
Singapore Dent J; 2007 Dec; 29(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 18472530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study.
Nandini Y; Vinitha KB; Manvi S; Smitha M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):668-74. PubMed ID: 24309347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions.
Cox JR; Brandt RL; Hughes HJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 May; 87(5):510-5. PubMed ID: 12070514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of cervical relining of acrylic resin copings on the accuracy of stone dies obtained using a polyether impression material.
de Sá AT; de Freitas CA; de Sá FC; Ursi WJ; Simões TC; de Freitas MF
J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 19089282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials.
Idris B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 8809262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation and comparison of dimensional accuracy of newly introduced elastomeric impression material using 3D laser scanners: an in vitro study.
Pandita A; Jain T; Yadav NS; Feroz SM; Pradeep ; Diwedi A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):265-8. PubMed ID: 23811657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of tray type and other variables on the palatal depth of casts made from irreversible hydrocolloid impressions.
Frank RP; Thielke SM; Johnson GH
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jan; 87(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 11807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
Purk JH; Willes MG; Tira DE; Eick JD; Hung SH
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
