These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22431053)

  • 1. [The effect of orthodontic treatment on facial profile of patients with Class II division 1 malocclusions].
    Yi S; Lin XP; Hu RD; Ni ZY
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Feb; 21(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 22431053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do the Most Attractive Faces of Patients With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Differ From Those With the Least Attractive Faces in Terms of Angular and Proportional Measurements Assessed on Frontal and Lateral Photographs?
    Mortada AA; Burhan AS; Hajeer MY; Nawaya FR; Sahtout GF
    Cureus; 2023 Jan; 15(1):e33455. PubMed ID: 36628400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of orthognathic surgery on profile esthetics in Class II:1 malocclusions.
    Klaus K; Heumann C; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Nov; 78(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 28660422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Facial soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Aksakalli S; Demir A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24714003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Golden proportions as predictors of attractiveness and malocclusion.
    Rajiv A; Juhi Y
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 25728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A measuring system for facial aesthetics in Caucasian adolescents: reproducibility and validity.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 16009665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessed facial normality after Twin Block therapy.
    Sattarzadeh AP; Lee RT
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 20133514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Panel perception of facial attractiveness.
    Kerr WJ; O'Donnell JM
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 17(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 2285698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients.
    Zouloumi ME; Tsiouli K; Psomiadis S; Kolokitha OE; Topouzelis N; Gkantidis N
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Nov; 20(1):42. PubMed ID: 31761963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptions of dental esthetics of Asian orthodontists and laypersons.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 16905060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography.
    Perović T; Blažej Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3415-3424. PubMed ID: 29791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of functional orthodontic treatment on facial attractiveness of children with Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Paduano S; Rongo R; Bucci R; Carvelli G; Cioffi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Apr; 42(2):144-150. PubMed ID: 31586412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The comparison of facial estethics between orthodontically treated patients and their parents.
    Aksakalli S; Demir A
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():903507. PubMed ID: 24222754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.