These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22431053)

  • 21. Role of sagittal and oblique smiling profiles in evaluating facial esthetics.
    Yang X; Yi Y; Yang S; Xue C; Wang Y; Chen M; Han X; Bai D
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 26(2):532-6. PubMed ID: 25668109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 12940556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Objective method for evaluating orthodontic treatment from the lay perspective: An eye-tracking study.
    Wang X; Cai B; Cao Y; Zhou C; Yang L; Liu R; Long X; Wang W; Gao D; Bao B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Oct; 150(4):601-610. PubMed ID: 27692417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Professionals' and laypersons' appreciation of various options for Class III surgical correction.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 19901039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Facial esthetics in adolescents and its relationship to "ideal" ratios and angles.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Straatman H; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):188.e1-8. PubMed ID: 18249280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of photographs of study models for IOTN scoring.
    Malik OH; Stevenson H; Mandall NA; Alsaeed MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2016 Nov; 32(2):221-228. PubMed ID: 29509348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical vertebral anomalies in skeletal malocclusions: a cross-sectional study on orthodontic patients at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan.
    Faruqui S; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(4):480-4. PubMed ID: 25307913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perceived facial changes of Class II Division 1 patients with convex profiles after functional orthopedic treatment followed by fixed orthodontic appliances.
    Tsiouli K; Topouzelis N; Papadopoulos MA; Gkantidis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jul; 152(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 28651771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].
    Wang YY; Guo CC; Zhou C; Fan ML; Wang WC; Bao BC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Dec; 21(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 23364553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The mechanism of Class II correction in surgical orthodontic treatment of adult Class II, division 1 malocclusions.
    Pancherz H; Ruf S; Erbe C; Hansen K
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):800-9. PubMed ID: 15673144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics.
    Spyropoulos MN; Halazonetis DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 11343017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Divine proportions and facial esthetics after manipulation of frontal photographs.
    Medici Filho E; Martins MV; dos Santos da Silva MA; Castilho JC; de Moraes LC; Gil CT
    World J Orthod; 2007; 8(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 17580503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Facial morphology and malocclusions.
    Bittner C; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Apr; 97(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 2321597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of the Rater's Gender on Assessing Facial Beauty in Adult Patients With Vertical and Horizontal Growth Patterns.
    Albitar MA; Burhan AS; Hajeer MY; Nawaya FR; Roumieh WK
    Cureus; 2024 Jun; 16(6):e63142. PubMed ID: 38919857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts.
    Akhare PJ; Daga A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Putative golden proportions as predictors of facial esthetics in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van 't Hof MA; van 't Hof BE; Maltha JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):480-3. PubMed ID: 18929264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.