These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22431198)

  • 1. Enhanced stent imaging improves the diagnosis of stent underexpansion and optimizes stent deployment.
    Sanidas EA; Maehara A; Barkama R; Mintz GS; Singh V; Hidalgo A; Hakim D; Leon MB; Moses JW; Weisz G
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):438-45. PubMed ID: 22431198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel angiographic technique, StentBoost, in comparison with intravascular ultrasound to assess stent expansion.
    Yang FF; Zhang LW; Huang DS; Shen D; Sun HY; Zhang CH; Wang YM; Zhang XW; Bai J; Ma YJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Mar; 124(6):939-42. PubMed ID: 21518607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of coronary stent deployment using computer enhanced x-ray images-validation against intravascular ultrasound and best practice recommendations.
    Davies AG; Conway D; Reid S; Cowen AR; Sivananthan M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Feb; 81(3):419-27. PubMed ID: 22262472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stent boost subtract imaging for the assessment of optimal stent deployment in coronary ostial lesion intervention: comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
    Zhang J; Duan Y; Jin Z; Wei Y; Yang S; Luo J; Ma D; Jing L; Liu H
    Int Heart J; 2015; 56(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 25742941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of adequate coronary stent expansion using StentBoost, a novel fluoroscopic image processing technique.
    Mishell JM; Vakharia KT; Ports TA; Yeghiazarians Y; Michaels AD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Jan; 69(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 17139686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedural Characteristics of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Their Clinical Implications.
    Lee SY; Zhang JJ; Mintz GS; Hong SJ; Ahn CM; Kim JS; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Kan J; Pan T; Gao X; Ge Z; Chen SL; Hong MK
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Jul; 11(14):e025258. PubMed ID: 35861828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography assessment of late in-stent restenosis: in vivo human correlation and methodological implications.
    Prati F; Pawlowski T; Sommariva L; Labellarte A; Manzoli A; Boccanelli A; Motolese M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2002 Oct; 57(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 12357511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis after optimal coronary stenting with initial quantitative coronary angiography guidance: an ATHEROREMO sub-study.
    Sarno G; Garg S; Gomez-Lara J; Garcia Garcia HM; Ligthart J; Bruining N; Onuma Y; Witberg K; van Geuns RJ; de Boer S; Wykrzykowska J; Schultz C; Duckers HJ; Regar E; de Jaegere P; de Feyter P; van Es GA; Boersma E; van der Giessen W; Serruys PW;
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Mar; 6(8):977-84. PubMed ID: 21330246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Angiographically confirmed stent thrombosis in contemporary practice: insights from intravascular ultrasound.
    Armstrong EJ; Kwa AT; Yeo KK; Mahmud E; Javed U; Patel M; Shunk KA; MacGregor JS; Low RI; Rogers JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 81(5):782-90. PubMed ID: 22511567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is quantitative angiography sufficient to guide stent implantation? A comparison with three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images.
    Prati F; Gil R; Di Mario C; Ozaki Y; Bruining N; Camenzind E; de Feyter PJ; Roelandt JR; Serruys PW
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 27(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 9199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of angiographic versus intravascular ultrasound parameters of drug-eluting stent efficacy (from TAXUS IV, V, and VI).
    Escolar E; Mintz GS; Popma J; Michalek A; Kim SW; Mandinov L; Koglin J; Stone G; Ellis SG; Grube E; Dawkins KD; Weissman NJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2007 Aug; 100(4):621-6. PubMed ID: 17697817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lesion characteristics and coronary stent selection with computed tomographic coronary angiography: a pilot investigation comparing CTA, QCA and IVUS.
    Kass M; Glover CA; Labinaz M; So DY; Chen L; Yam Y; Chow BJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 22(7):328-34. PubMed ID: 20603505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
    Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate and reproducible reconstruction of coronary arteries and endothelial shear stress calculation using 3D OCT: comparative study to 3D IVUS and 3D QCA.
    Toutouzas K; Chatzizisis YS; Riga M; Giannopoulos A; Antoniadis AP; Tu S; Fujino Y; Mitsouras D; Doulaverakis C; Tsampoulatidis I; Koutkias VG; Bouki K; Li Y; Chouvarda I; Cheimariotis G; Maglaveras N; Kompatsiaris I; Nakamura S; Reiber JH; Rybicki F; Karvounis H; Stefanadis C; Tousoulis D; Giannoglou GD
    Atherosclerosis; 2015 Jun; 240(2):510-9. PubMed ID: 25932791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo evaluation of axial integrity of coronary stents using intravascular ultrasound: Insights on longitudinal stent deformation.
    Dvir D; Kitabata H; Barbash IM; Minha S; Badr S; Loh JP; Chen F; Torguson R; Waksman R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Sep; 84(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 24227477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital enhancement of stent images in primary and secondary percutaneous coronary revascularisation.
    Córdova J; Aleong G; Colmenarez H; Cruz A; Canales E; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Hernández R; Alfonso F; Macaya C; Bañuelos C; den Hartog W; Escaned J
    EuroIntervention; 2009 May; 5 Suppl D():D101-6. PubMed ID: 19736057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of stent dimensions with a novel intracoronary balloon-based system: comparative study versus intravascular ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography. The CAMUS - Coronary Angioplasty Metricath vs. UltraSound Trial.
    van der Giessen WJ; Regar E; McFadden E; McDougall I; Serruys PW
    EuroIntervention; 2005 Aug; 1(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 19758910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application, feasibility, and efficacy of a combined intravascular ultrasound and stent delivery system: results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Rieber J; Gockel K; Koschyk D; Erhard I; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Klauss V
    J Interv Cardiol; 2005 Oct; 18(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 16202113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment.
    Hanekamp CE; Koolen JJ; Pijls NH; Michels HR; Bonnier HJ
    Circulation; 1999 Mar; 99(8):1015-21. PubMed ID: 10051294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.